Doubly robust criterion for causal inference

Abstract In causal inference, semiparametric estimation using propensity scores has rapidly developed in various directions. At the same time, although model selection is indispensable in statistical analysis, an information criterion for selecting the regression structure between the potential outcome and explanatory variables has not been well developed. Here, based on the original definition of AIC, we derive an AIC‐type criterion for propensity score analysis. A risk based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence is defined as the cornerstone, and general causal inference models and general causal effects are treated. Considering the high importance of doubly robust estimation, we make the information criterion itself doubly robust so that it is an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the risk even under some model misspecification. In simulation studies, we compare the derived criterion with an existing weighted quasi‐likelihood information criterion and confirm that the former outperforms the latter. Real data analyses indicate that results using the two criteria can differ significantly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Statistics
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.70001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Doubly robust criterion for causal inference

Yoshiyuki Ninomiya, Takamichi Baba
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Statistics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
article

Doubly robust criterion for causal inference

Yoshiyuki Ninomiya, Takamichi Baba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In causal inference, semiparametric estimation using propensity scores has rapidly developed in various directions. At the same time, although model selection is indispensable in statistical analysis, an information criterion for selecting the regression structure between the potential outcome and explanatory variables has not been well developed. Here, based on the original definition of AIC, we derive an AIC‐type criterion for propensity score analysis. A risk based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence is defined as the cornerstone, and general causal inference models and general causal effects are treated. Considering the high importance of doubly robust estimation, we make the information criterion itself doubly robust so that it is an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the risk even under some model misspecification. In simulation studies, we compare the derived criterion with an existing weighted quasi‐likelihood information criterion and confirm that the former outperforms the latter. Real data analyses indicate that results using the two criteria can differ significantly.

Canadian Journal of StatisticsVol. 53(3)
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP), Shionogi (Japan) (JP), The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.