Unsupervised label generation for severely imbalanced fraud data

Many datasets remain unlabeled as obtaining labeled data for machine learning is frequently expensive and necessitates a high level of domain expertise. Another challenge facing machine learning practitioners is class imbalance. In domains such as fraud detection, overcoming significant class imbalance presents an additional difficulty, as seen in the Credit Card Fraud and Medicare Part D claims datasets used in this work. Our novel binary labeling method automates the labeling process, with minimal expert input, using the combination of an ensemble unsupervised method with a percentile thresholding technique. The labels are further refined through an iterative minimization process that selects only the highest-confidence instances to receive a final labeling of fraudulent. Our labeling approach successfully overcomes the challenge of generating labels for severely imbalanced data, labeling instances as fraudulent or not, in an entirely unsupervised framework. Additionally, and in contrast to conventional methods, our methodology provides a more efficient evaluation by directly assessing the generated labels’ efficacy without requiring the training of a supervised classifier to evaluate the labels. In order to examine the effect on label efficacy, we report results across a range of positive instance levels for each dataset. The quality of the newly generated class labels is thoroughly assessed using three evaluation metrics: Jaccard Index (JI), Precision, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Our empirical results demonstrate our approach consistently outperforms the baseline, Isolation Forest (IF), for all positive instance levels and metrics. Our novel methodology demonstrates the ability to provide accurate and robust labels and overcome the challenge of class imbalance, which could result in better machine learning applications in highly imbalanced domains and more efficient evaluation of newly generated class labels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Big Data
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01120-x
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsupervised label generation for severely imbalanced fraud data

Mary Anne Walauskis, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar
8 citations
Journal Of Big Data
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
19.85
article

Unsupervised label generation for severely imbalanced fraud data

Mary Anne Walauskis, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Many datasets remain unlabeled as obtaining labeled data for machine learning is frequently expensive and necessitates a high level of domain expertise. Another challenge facing machine learning practitioners is class imbalance. In domains such as fraud detection, overcoming significant class imbalance presents an additional difficulty, as seen in the Credit Card Fraud and Medicare Part D claims datasets used in this work. Our novel binary labeling method automates the labeling process, with minimal expert input, using the combination of an ensemble unsupervised method with a percentile thresholding technique. The labels are further refined through an iterative minimization process that selects only the highest-confidence instances to receive a final labeling of fraudulent. Our labeling approach successfully overcomes the challenge of generating labels for severely imbalanced data, labeling instances as fraudulent or not, in an entirely unsupervised framework. Additionally, and in contrast to conventional methods, our methodology provides a more efficient evaluation by directly assessing the generated labels’ efficacy without requiring the training of a supervised classifier to evaluate the labels. In order to examine the effect on label efficacy, we report results across a range of positive instance levels for each dataset. The quality of the newly generated class labels is thoroughly assessed using three evaluation metrics: Jaccard Index (JI), Precision, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Our empirical results demonstrate our approach consistently outperforms the baseline, Isolation Forest (IF), for all positive instance levels and metrics. Our novel methodology demonstrates the ability to provide accurate and robust labels and overcome the challenge of class imbalance, which could result in better machine learning applications in highly imbalanced domains and more efficient evaluation of newly generated class labels.

Journal Of Big DataVol. 12(1)
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
19.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.