Comparative analysis of thermal management systems in electric vehicles at extreme weather conditions: Case study on Nissan Leaf 2019 Plus, Chevrolet Bolt 2020 and Tesla Model 3 2020

With the surge in electric vehicle (EV) adoption and the need for extended driving ranges, optimizing energy efficiency, particularly through thermal management, is critical, especially in extreme weather. Managing the substantial energy needed for cabin climate control and battery temperature regulation can increase energy demands by over 50 %, severely limiting range. This study conducts a comparative analysis of thermal management systems (TMS) in three popular EV vehicles, 2020 Chevrolet Bolt, 2019 Nissan Leaf Plus, and 2020 Tesla Model 3, evaluating their distinct TMS configurations and performance under varied weather conditions. Using both numerical simulations and experimental data collected on a controlled test bench at Argonne National Laboratory, we assess how TMS architecture and operational modes influence energy consumption and range. A comprehensive TMS model was developed, integrating cabin and battery thermal sub-models in the Autonomie software platform, to simulate temperature fluctuations and range impacts. Cabin climate was modeled using a mono-zonal approach, while battery cell temperature distribution was estimated through a 2D nodal structure. Each vehicle’s distinct TMS setup was evaluated: the Chevrolet Bolt and Tesla Model 3 use a dual evaporator vapor compression cycle with a PTC heater for the cabin and a coolant loop for battery thermal management ; the Nissan Leaf Plus employs a heat pump with a PTC heater for the cabin and air-cooling for the battery. Tests conducted at ambient temperatures of 35 °C, 22 °C, −7°C, and −18 °C reveal significant differences in energy use and range reduction across both configurations and conditions. At 35 °C, the Tesla Model 3, Chevrolet Bolt, and Nissan Leaf Plus have a range reduction of 8 %, 9 %, and 13 %, respectively, due to air conditioning. In winter, heating technology is paramount; at −7°C, the Nissan Leaf’s heat pump configuration achieves a lower range reduction (19.3 %) compared to the Tesla and Chevrolet Bolt PTC heaters, which reduce range by 28.3 % and 31 %, respectively. This study provides valuable insights for automotive engineers, EV technology researchers, and thermal management system designers aiming to enhance electric vehicle performance by understanding how different weather conditions and TMS architectures impact energy consumption and driving range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119706
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of thermal management systems in electric vehicles at extreme weather conditions: Case study on Nissan Leaf 2019 Plus, Chevrolet Bolt 2020 and Tesla Model 3 2020

Charbel Mansour, Kevin Stutenberg, Rabih Al Haddad, Jigu Seo et al.
15 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
10.24
article

Comparative analysis of thermal management systems in electric vehicles at extreme weather conditions: Case study on Nissan Leaf 2019 Plus, Chevrolet Bolt 2020 and Tesla Model 3 2020

Charbel Mansour, Kevin Stutenberg, Rabih Al Haddad, Jigu Seo, Namdoo Kim, Maroun Nemer
article en
15 citations

Abstract

With the surge in electric vehicle (EV) adoption and the need for extended driving ranges, optimizing energy efficiency, particularly through thermal management, is critical, especially in extreme weather. Managing the substantial energy needed for cabin climate control and battery temperature regulation can increase energy demands by over 50 %, severely limiting range. This study conducts a comparative analysis of thermal management systems (TMS) in three popular EV vehicles, 2020 Chevrolet Bolt, 2019 Nissan Leaf Plus, and 2020 Tesla Model 3, evaluating their distinct TMS configurations and performance under varied weather conditions. Using both numerical simulations and experimental data collected on a controlled test bench at Argonne National Laboratory, we assess how TMS architecture and operational modes influence energy consumption and range. A comprehensive TMS model was developed, integrating cabin and battery thermal sub-models in the Autonomie software platform, to simulate temperature fluctuations and range impacts. Cabin climate was modeled using a mono-zonal approach, while battery cell temperature distribution was estimated through a 2D nodal structure. Each vehicle’s distinct TMS setup was evaluated: the Chevrolet Bolt and Tesla Model 3 use a dual evaporator vapor compression cycle with a PTC heater for the cabin and a coolant loop for battery thermal management ; the Nissan Leaf Plus employs a heat pump with a PTC heater for the cabin and air-cooling for the battery. Tests conducted at ambient temperatures of 35 °C, 22 °C, −7°C, and −18 °C reveal significant differences in energy use and range reduction across both configurations and conditions. At 35 °C, the Tesla Model 3, Chevrolet Bolt, and Nissan Leaf Plus have a range reduction of 8 %, 9 %, and 13 %, respectively, due to air conditioning. In winter, heating technology is paramount; at −7°C, the Nissan Leaf’s heat pump configuration achieves a lower range reduction (19.3 %) compared to the Tesla and Chevrolet Bolt PTC heaters, which reduce range by 28.3 % and 31 %, respectively. This study provides valuable insights for automotive engineers, EV technology researchers, and thermal management system designers aiming to enhance electric vehicle performance by understanding how different weather conditions and TMS architectures impact energy consumption and driving range.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 332
Argonne National Laboratory (US), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR)
U.S. Department of Energy
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
10.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.