INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES DURING LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION

Objectives: Laryngoscopy and intubation causes a profound sympathetic response, causing significant increase in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure, potentially leading to complications like laryngospasm and bronchospasm, requiring close monitoring and expert anesthesia care. This study evaluated intranasal and intravenous effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in mitigating adverse hemodynamic consequences to laryngoscopy and intubation, aiming to discern the optimal route for hemodynamic stability. Methods: This double-blinded, randomized study involved 72 adults (18–60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II) undergoing various surgeries requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Group DIV received Inj. Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg intravenously as an infusion in 100 mL Normal Saline over 10 min, 40 min before induction of general anesthesia. Group DIN received Inj. Dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg (1 μg/kg in each nostril) intranasally through atomizer 40 min before induction of general anesthesia. The study’s primary objective was to optimize dexmedetomidine’s route and dosage for minimizing laryngoscopy’s stress response. Secondary outcomes included assessing incidence of any adverse event. Results: Both study groups showed similar demographics, study duration, and baseline hemodynamics. Hemodynamic parameters decreased significantly 30–40 min post-administration of study drug and after induction (p<0.05). Laryngoscopy and intubation increased HR and mean arterial pressure (MAP) where Group DIN HR (98.86±17.16 bpm), MAP (108.5±15.69 mmHg) showed more increase than Group DIV HR (88.89±9.23 bpm) and MAP (102.36±9.06 mmHg). Group DIV showed greater attenuation of hemodynamic parameters at 1, 3, and 5 min post-laryngoscopy (p<0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg is more effective than intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg in attenuating the hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i3.53955
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES DURING LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION

Sara Mary Thomas, Dushyant Chavda, Kalpesh R. Patil, P. B. Anand
1 citations
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
2.19
article

INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES DURING LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION

Sara Mary Thomas, Dushyant Chavda, Kalpesh R. Patil, P. B. Anand
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Laryngoscopy and intubation causes a profound sympathetic response, causing significant increase in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure, potentially leading to complications like laryngospasm and bronchospasm, requiring close monitoring and expert anesthesia care. This study evaluated intranasal and intravenous effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in mitigating adverse hemodynamic consequences to laryngoscopy and intubation, aiming to discern the optimal route for hemodynamic stability. Methods: This double-blinded, randomized study involved 72 adults (18–60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II) undergoing various surgeries requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Group DIV received Inj. Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg intravenously as an infusion in 100 mL Normal Saline over 10 min, 40 min before induction of general anesthesia. Group DIN received Inj. Dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg (1 μg/kg in each nostril) intranasally through atomizer 40 min before induction of general anesthesia. The study’s primary objective was to optimize dexmedetomidine’s route and dosage for minimizing laryngoscopy’s stress response. Secondary outcomes included assessing incidence of any adverse event. Results: Both study groups showed similar demographics, study duration, and baseline hemodynamics. Hemodynamic parameters decreased significantly 30–40 min post-administration of study drug and after induction (p<0.05). Laryngoscopy and intubation increased HR and mean arterial pressure (MAP) where Group DIN HR (98.86±17.16 bpm), MAP (108.5±15.69 mmHg) showed more increase than Group DIV HR (88.89±9.23 bpm) and MAP (102.36±9.06 mmHg). Group DIV showed greater attenuation of hemodynamic parameters at 1, 3, and 5 min post-laryngoscopy (p<0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg is more effective than intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg in attenuating the hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.