Practical Consequences of the Bias in the Laplace Approximation to Marginal Likelihood for Hierarchical Models

Due to the high dimensional integration over latent variables, computing marginal likelihood and posterior distributions for the parameters of a general hierarchical model is a difficult task. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms are commonly used to approximate the posterior distributions. These algorithms, though effective, are computationally intensive and can be slow for large, complex models. As an alternative to the MCMC approach, the Laplace approximation (LA) has been successfully used to obtain fast and accurate approximations to the posterior mean and other derived quantities related to the posterior distribution. In the last couple of decades, LA has also been used to approximate the marginal likelihood function and the posterior distribution. In this paper, we show that the bias in the Laplace approximation to the marginal likelihood has substantial practical consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e27030289
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Consequences of the Bias in the Laplace Approximation to Marginal Likelihood for Hierarchical Models

José Miguel Ponciano, C. George Glen, Subhash R. Lele
3 citations
Entropy
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
7.89
article

Practical Consequences of the Bias in the Laplace Approximation to Marginal Likelihood for Hierarchical Models

José Miguel Ponciano, C. George Glen, Subhash R. Lele
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Due to the high dimensional integration over latent variables, computing marginal likelihood and posterior distributions for the parameters of a general hierarchical model is a difficult task. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms are commonly used to approximate the posterior distributions. These algorithms, though effective, are computationally intensive and can be slow for large, complex models. As an alternative to the MCMC approach, the Laplace approximation (LA) has been successfully used to obtain fast and accurate approximations to the posterior mean and other derived quantities related to the posterior distribution. In the last couple of decades, LA has also been used to approximate the marginal likelihood function and the posterior distribution. In this paper, we show that the bias in the Laplace approximation to the marginal likelihood has substantial practical consequences.

EntropyVol. 27(3)
Sea Turtle Conservancy (US), University of Alberta (CA), University of Florida (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
7.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Practical Consequences of the Bias in the Laplace Approximation to Marginal Likelihood for Hierarchical Models — José Miguel Ponciano, C. George Glen, et al. · Entropy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS