Frustration Management in Male and Female College Students and Their Academic Achievement

Abstract: Background: Mathematics is among the most conspicuous academic topics regarding the elicitation of learning anxiety. “Math anxiety” is more prevalent in girls and young women than in boys and men, which has been attributed to female stereotypes. The present study investigates how, compared to other introductory courses, students’ management of attendance to mathematics exams is matched for the semester in which courses are offered. Methods: The dataset contained all students with a valid enrollment in the academic years 2011/2012–2023/2024 in a university’s database, comprising 4,445 students and 17,623 individual exam results. We used the average grades and the number of days to the first attempt on an exam and a successful attempt as the major outcome variables. We differentiated gender and type of the exam, i.e., mathematics or introduction exams, as independent variables. We used ANOVA models to calculate the differences. Results: Female students have better grades than males in mathematics courses but not in introductory courses. Both female and male students had better grades in introductory than in mathematics courses. In mathematics courses, females make their first attempts earlier than males, but there are no gender differences in the time to first attempt of introductory courses. Both females and males also make first attempts earlier in introductory than in mathematics courses, and men also make earlier attempts in introductory than in mathematics courses. We found no differences between genders in the time to a successful attempt in both mathematics and introductory courses. Both females and males made successful attempts in introductory courses earlier than in mathematics courses. Discussion: These findings challenge stereotypes about math anxiety and female performance. Female students outperform males in mathematics courses, reflecting resilience and proactive engagement, as evidenced by earlier first attempts. Male students’ delayed attempts may indicate confidence or postponement tendencies. The absence of gender differences in introductory courses suggests that these patterns are specific to mathematics. Both genders perform better and attempt exams earlier in introductory courses, highlighting the greater challenges of mathematics courses. These results underline the need to address stereotype-driven barriers and math anxiety through interventions fostering confidence and early engagement, promoting equitable outcomes in mathematics education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lernen und Lernstörungen
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1024/2235-0977/a000479
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frustration Management in Male and Female College Students and Their Academic Achievement

Guilherme Wood, Alexander Karl Ferdinand Loder
2 citations
Lernen und Lernstörungen
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
4.61
article

Frustration Management in Male and Female College Students and Their Academic Achievement

Guilherme Wood, Alexander Karl Ferdinand Loder
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Mathematics is among the most conspicuous academic topics regarding the elicitation of learning anxiety. “Math anxiety” is more prevalent in girls and young women than in boys and men, which has been attributed to female stereotypes. The present study investigates how, compared to other introductory courses, students’ management of attendance to mathematics exams is matched for the semester in which courses are offered. Methods: The dataset contained all students with a valid enrollment in the academic years 2011/2012–2023/2024 in a university’s database, comprising 4,445 students and 17,623 individual exam results. We used the average grades and the number of days to the first attempt on an exam and a successful attempt as the major outcome variables. We differentiated gender and type of the exam, i.e., mathematics or introduction exams, as independent variables. We used ANOVA models to calculate the differences. Results: Female students have better grades than males in mathematics courses but not in introductory courses. Both female and male students had better grades in introductory than in mathematics courses. In mathematics courses, females make their first attempts earlier than males, but there are no gender differences in the time to first attempt of introductory courses. Both females and males also make first attempts earlier in introductory than in mathematics courses, and men also make earlier attempts in introductory than in mathematics courses. We found no differences between genders in the time to a successful attempt in both mathematics and introductory courses. Both females and males made successful attempts in introductory courses earlier than in mathematics courses. Discussion: These findings challenge stereotypes about math anxiety and female performance. Female students outperform males in mathematics courses, reflecting resilience and proactive engagement, as evidenced by earlier first attempts. Male students’ delayed attempts may indicate confidence or postponement tendencies. The absence of gender differences in introductory courses suggests that these patterns are specific to mathematics. Both genders perform better and attempt exams earlier in introductory courses, highlighting the greater challenges of mathematics courses. These results underline the need to address stereotype-driven barriers and math anxiety through interventions fostering confidence and early engagement, promoting equitable outcomes in mathematics education.

Lernen und LernstörungenVol. 14(2)
University of Graz (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.