COMPARISON OF METHODS SYNDROME AND SOFT DECODING FOR HAMMING CODE

Information technology and computer technology are rapidly developing, which leads to increased requirements for information transmission systems. To meet current security requirements, it is necessary to ensure a high level of information integrity and accessibility. One of the most effective ways to ensure the integrity of information is noise-resistant coding. The speed of data acquisition and the correctness of their recovery largely depends on the choice of the decoding method. Many decoding methods have a high complexity of implementation, so their use is not always effective. This article discusses a comparison of syndromic decoding and soft decoding methods for a linear Hamming code. The paper presents a comparison of the speed and correctness of the soft decoding algorithm described in patent RU 2738724C1 with hard decoding methods – syndrome decoding and the Viterbi algorithm. The implementation of the decoding algorithms and algorithm of parallel syndromes table computation without thread blocks on Java programming language has been carried out in this work. The paper provides a detailed description of the Hamming code, syndrome decoding and soft decoding, and a comparison of these decoding methods is demonstrated and analyzed in detail. Conclusions are presented showing that the proposed probabilistic decoding method has better characteristics in terms of speed and correctness than all other methods, and hard decoding methods have on average more errors than the soft decoding algorithm for a certain number of iterations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik komp iuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologii
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14489/vkit.2024.11.pp.046-053
Primary Topic
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF METHODS SYNDROME AND SOFT DECODING FOR HAMMING CODE

Igor Zikratov, Алла Левина, Andrew Plotnikov, Alina A. Lanina
Vestnik komp iuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologii
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
article

COMPARISON OF METHODS SYNDROME AND SOFT DECODING FOR HAMMING CODE

Igor Zikratov, Алла Левина, Andrew Plotnikov, Alina A. Lanina
article en

Abstract

Information technology and computer technology are rapidly developing, which leads to increased requirements for information transmission systems. To meet current security requirements, it is necessary to ensure a high level of information integrity and accessibility. One of the most effective ways to ensure the integrity of information is noise-resistant coding. The speed of data acquisition and the correctness of their recovery largely depends on the choice of the decoding method. Many decoding methods have a high complexity of implementation, so their use is not always effective. This article discusses a comparison of syndromic decoding and soft decoding methods for a linear Hamming code. The paper presents a comparison of the speed and correctness of the soft decoding algorithm described in patent RU 2738724C1 with hard decoding methods – syndrome decoding and the Viterbi algorithm. The implementation of the decoding algorithms and algorithm of parallel syndromes table computation without thread blocks on Java programming language has been carried out in this work. The paper provides a detailed description of the Hamming code, syndrome decoding and soft decoding, and a comparison of these decoding methods is demonstrated and analyzed in detail. Conclusions are presented showing that the proposed probabilistic decoding method has better characteristics in terms of speed and correctness than all other methods, and hard decoding methods have on average more errors than the soft decoding algorithm for a certain number of iterations.

Vestnik komp iuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologii(245)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARISON OF METHODS SYNDROME AND SOFT DECODING FOR HAMMING CODE — Igor Zikratov, Алла Левина, et al. · Vestnik komp iuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologii (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS