Comparative Study of Different Passivation Layers for n‐i‐p Perovskite Solar Cell for Indoor Applications

Indoor photovoltaics (IPV) plays a critical role in powering low‐consumption devices within the rapidly growing Internet of Things (IoT). Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have demonstrated impressive indoor power conversion efficiencies (iPCEs) exceeding 40%, driven by advancements in bulk and surface passivation techniques. These approaches mitigate trap states and recombination losses, significantly enhancing device efficiency and long‐term stability. This study investigates the impact of surface passivation on the PSC performance by employing iodide‐based passivators—phenethylammonium iodide (PEAI), octylammonium iodide (OAI), and guanidinium iodide (GUI)—alongside the Lewis base molecule 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (DPPP), which, to the best of our knowledge, is introduced for the first time in n‐i‐p structured PSCs. SEM and XRD analyses revealed that DPPP‐passivated samples exhibited superior morphological and structural stability after long‐term ambient aging compared to other passivations. Under indoor 1000 Lx LED light illumination, the DPPP‐passivated device achieved an iPCE of 33.14%, closely approaching the highest iPCE of 34.47% obtained with PEAI. Furthermore, the DPPP‐passivated device demonstrated the highest stability under thermal stress (85°C) with a T80 of 753 h. This study highlights the impact of passivation layers on PSC performance and stability under low light conditions, paving the way for more effective strategies to advance perovskite materials in IPV applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar RRL
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202400849
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Perovskite Materials and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Different Passivation Layers for n‐i‐p Perovskite Solar Cell for Indoor Applications

Francesco Biccari, Aldo Di Carlo, Usman Ali Shah, G. Shankar et al.
1 citations
Solar RRL
Perovskite Materials and Applications
0.73
article

Comparative Study of Different Passivation Layers for n‐i‐p Perovskite Solar Cell for Indoor Applications

Francesco Biccari, Aldo Di Carlo, Usman Ali Shah, G. Shankar, Emanuele Calabrò, Claudia Malerba, Francesca Zarotti, A. Mittiga, Vittoria Novelli, Pier Paolo Bonaccini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Indoor photovoltaics (IPV) plays a critical role in powering low‐consumption devices within the rapidly growing Internet of Things (IoT). Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have demonstrated impressive indoor power conversion efficiencies (iPCEs) exceeding 40%, driven by advancements in bulk and surface passivation techniques. These approaches mitigate trap states and recombination losses, significantly enhancing device efficiency and long‐term stability. This study investigates the impact of surface passivation on the PSC performance by employing iodide‐based passivators—phenethylammonium iodide (PEAI), octylammonium iodide (OAI), and guanidinium iodide (GUI)—alongside the Lewis base molecule 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (DPPP), which, to the best of our knowledge, is introduced for the first time in n‐i‐p structured PSCs. SEM and XRD analyses revealed that DPPP‐passivated samples exhibited superior morphological and structural stability after long‐term ambient aging compared to other passivations. Under indoor 1000 Lx LED light illumination, the DPPP‐passivated device achieved an iPCE of 33.14%, closely approaching the highest iPCE of 34.47% obtained with PEAI. Furthermore, the DPPP‐passivated device demonstrated the highest stability under thermal stress (85°C) with a T80 of 753 h. This study highlights the impact of passivation layers on PSC performance and stability under low light conditions, paving the way for more effective strategies to advance perovskite materials in IPV applications.

Solar RRLVol. 9(6)
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Institute of Structure of Matter (IT), National Research Council (IT), ENEA Casaccia Research Centre, University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Perovskite Materials and Applications
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.