The illness severity scores can predict the need for respiratory and inotropic support in newborns with critical congenital heart malformations

Background and objectives. The illness severity scoring systems have been developed and validated to assess mortality risks based on clinical conditions and aid critical patient decision-making. Dextro-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) and coarctation of the aorta (CoA) are critical congenital heart defects that require medical treatment from birth and surgical repair in the neonatal period. The study aimed to compare the values of three scoring systems in predicting the need for respiratory and inotropic support for newborns with D-TGA and CoA. Materials and methods. An observational study was conducted on inborn infants diagnosed with D-TGA and CoA admitted to the newborn intensive care unit (NICU) within 12 hours of birth at a referral unit for congenital heart disease between January 2018 and December 2020. Newborns with D-TGA and CoA who died within the first 24 hours of birth, outborn infants, and those with a late diagnosis were excluded. For each patient, the Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB-II), Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II (SNAP-II), and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-Perinatal Extension-II (SNAPPE-II) were calculated. Results. A total of 69 newborns were included in the current study, 30 (43.48%) of whom were infants with D-TGA (D-TGA Group) and 39 (56.52%) with CoA (CoA Group). Newborns who required respiratory support had significantly higher CRIB-II scores (3.03 ± 0.63 vs. 1.34 ± 0.19; p = 0.001), SNAP-II scores (26.61 ± 13.96 vs. 12.43 ± 9.98; p = 0.001), and SNAPPE-II scores (33.04 ± 2.91 vs. 14.47 ± 12.35; p = 0.001) compared to those who did not require it. Significantly higher CRIB-II (3.22 ± 0.67 vs. 1.56 ± 0.23; p = 0.003), SNAP-II (22.91 ± 14.57 vs. 14.28 ± 1.58; p = 0.003), and SNAPPE-II (28.82 ± 17.95 vs. 16.58 ± 13.85; p = 0.003) scores were also associated with the need for inotropic support. When comparing the predictive efficiency of illness severity scores for detecting the risk of needing respiratory and inotropic support, they were more effective at predicting the need for ventilation and less effective at predicting the need for inotropes. Conclusions. The illness severity scores can effectively predict the need for pre-surgery interventions. Their simplicity makes them suitable for routine use.