The governmentality of funding: Cultures of audit and compliance in Australian refugee and asylum seeker support organisations

Abstract In Australia, people seeking refuge receive differing material and financial support depending on their status as an asylum seeker or refugee. Aside from statutory support, other community‐based support is delivered mostly by non‐government organisations and is typically funded by government grants. Securing funding is critical for the ongoing sustainability and survival of many organisations. However, much funding in the refugee and asylum seeker support sector is only available for services adhering to donor‐determined funding agreements and narrowly defined programs with measurable criteria and strict reporting requirements. This paper examines the effects of these workplace technologies of governmentality, audit, and compliance, on workers within government‐funded community‐based support organisations in South Australia, drawing on ethnographic research undertaken during 2019 and 2020. This paper argues that significant transactional and moral burdens arise from funding and workplace governmentality, impacting organisational legitimacy and mission. Support organisations must be attuned to this and factor this knowledge into choices about their funding mix and operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Journal of Anthropology
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.70001
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The governmentality of funding: Cultures of audit and compliance in Australian refugee and asylum seeker support organisations

Alison Reid
The Australian Journal of Anthropology
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

The governmentality of funding: Cultures of audit and compliance in Australian refugee and asylum seeker support organisations

Alison Reid
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Australia, people seeking refuge receive differing material and financial support depending on their status as an asylum seeker or refugee. Aside from statutory support, other community‐based support is delivered mostly by non‐government organisations and is typically funded by government grants. Securing funding is critical for the ongoing sustainability and survival of many organisations. However, much funding in the refugee and asylum seeker support sector is only available for services adhering to donor‐determined funding agreements and narrowly defined programs with measurable criteria and strict reporting requirements. This paper examines the effects of these workplace technologies of governmentality, audit, and compliance, on workers within government‐funded community‐based support organisations in South Australia, drawing on ethnographic research undertaken during 2019 and 2020. This paper argues that significant transactional and moral burdens arise from funding and workplace governmentality, impacting organisational legitimacy and mission. Support organisations must be attuned to this and factor this knowledge into choices about their funding mix and operations.

The Australian Journal of AnthropologyVol. 36(1)
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The governmentality of funding: Cultures of audit and compliance in Australian refugee and asylum seeker support organisations — Alison Reid · The Australian Journal of Anthropology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS