Regulation and Bank Lending in South Africa: A Narrative Index Approach

ABSTRACT The extension of affordable credit is a key component of financial inclusion but it could reduce the stability of the financial sector. Prudential policies, on the other hand, are designed to mitigate financial sector risk. Thus, policies aimed at the extension of credit and prudential regulations may be in opposition. This study estimates and contrasts the impact of these potentially contradictory regulations on the bank lending volumes of South Africa's largest banks. We find that announcements of prudential regulation are associated with an increase in secured lending, while the implementation of prudential regulation is associated with an increase in unsecured lending. Despite tighter implementation of prudential reforms, we observe an increase in unsecured lending that is driven by unsecured lending to corporates. Our results also indicate the contractionary effects of prudential regulation on mortgage lending. Furthermore, the estimated effects of efforts aimed at extending credit to households have no impact on bank lending to households but increase secured lending to corporates. The two regulatory approaches overlap with regard to lending to corporates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of Economics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12401
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulation and Bank Lending in South Africa: A Narrative Index Approach

Steven F. Koch, Xolani Sibande, Deliwe Maria Nxumalo, Nicola Viegi et al.
1 citations
South African Journal of Economics
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
2.21
article

Regulation and Bank Lending in South Africa: A Narrative Index Approach

Steven F. Koch, Xolani Sibande, Deliwe Maria Nxumalo, Nicola Viegi, Keaoleboga Mncube
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extension of affordable credit is a key component of financial inclusion but it could reduce the stability of the financial sector. Prudential policies, on the other hand, are designed to mitigate financial sector risk. Thus, policies aimed at the extension of credit and prudential regulations may be in opposition. This study estimates and contrasts the impact of these potentially contradictory regulations on the bank lending volumes of South Africa's largest banks. We find that announcements of prudential regulation are associated with an increase in secured lending, while the implementation of prudential regulation is associated with an increase in unsecured lending. Despite tighter implementation of prudential reforms, we observe an increase in unsecured lending that is driven by unsecured lending to corporates. Our results also indicate the contractionary effects of prudential regulation on mortgage lending. Furthermore, the estimated effects of efforts aimed at extending credit to households have no impact on bank lending to households but increase secured lending to corporates. The two regulatory approaches overlap with regard to lending to corporates.

South African Journal of EconomicsVol. 93(1)
South African Reserve Bank (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.