Driving Energy Transition Through Artificial Intelligence: Integrating Economic, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ECON-ESG) Factors in OECD Countries

Abstract This research examines the impacts of economic (ECON) factors, ESG factors, and artificial intelligence (AI) factors on energy transition (ET) in 33 OECD countries. The CS-ARDL model is utilized to analyze both long-term links and short-term dynamics in panel datasets, accounting for cross-sectional dependence, between 2002 and 2020. The findings indicate that while economic factors (ECON) negatively affect energy transition (ET), environmental factors (E) positively affect it. However, while social factors and AI demonstrate negative relationships with ET, governance factors demonstrate positive relationships. Finally, the impact of ECON-ESG on energy transition (ET) is negative. Some inferences and policy implications are as follows: (i) The negative effects of economic factors (ECON) on ET suggest that focusing on energy transition through only economic growth cannot be enough. Economic growth should be integrated into the energy transition by increasing energy efficiency. (ii) The negative effect of artificial intelligence (AI) on ET can be interpreted as the high investment costs of AI technologies may make energy transition projects challenging to finance and reduce their applicability. Policymakers can develop innovative financing models to finance energy transition projects related to AI technologies. For example, they can establish performance-based financing models for energy efficiency services. (iii) The negative effect of broad-based sustainability (ECON-ESG) with additional economic factors (ECON) to ESG on ET can be interpreted as follows. Some economic policies may contradict environmental, social, and government policies. For example, policies encouraging short-term economic growth can damage long-term environmental and social impacts, negatively impacting the energy transition. Adopting a holistic approach that integrates economic, environmental, social, governance, and artificial intelligence factors is critical for policymakers to accelerate energy transition and achieve sustainable development goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-025-02687-9
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
56.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving Energy Transition Through Artificial Intelligence: Integrating Economic, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ECON-ESG) Factors in OECD Countries

Cem Işık, Hasibul Islam, Serdar Ongan
18 citations
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
56.36
article

Driving Energy Transition Through Artificial Intelligence: Integrating Economic, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ECON-ESG) Factors in OECD Countries

Cem Işık, Hasibul Islam, Serdar Ongan
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Abstract This research examines the impacts of economic (ECON) factors, ESG factors, and artificial intelligence (AI) factors on energy transition (ET) in 33 OECD countries. The CS-ARDL model is utilized to analyze both long-term links and short-term dynamics in panel datasets, accounting for cross-sectional dependence, between 2002 and 2020. The findings indicate that while economic factors (ECON) negatively affect energy transition (ET), environmental factors (E) positively affect it. However, while social factors and AI demonstrate negative relationships with ET, governance factors demonstrate positive relationships. Finally, the impact of ECON-ESG on energy transition (ET) is negative. Some inferences and policy implications are as follows: (i) The negative effects of economic factors (ECON) on ET suggest that focusing on energy transition through only economic growth cannot be enough. Economic growth should be integrated into the energy transition by increasing energy efficiency. (ii) The negative effect of artificial intelligence (AI) on ET can be interpreted as the high investment costs of AI technologies may make energy transition projects challenging to finance and reduce their applicability. Policymakers can develop innovative financing models to finance energy transition projects related to AI technologies. For example, they can establish performance-based financing models for energy efficiency services. (iii) The negative effect of broad-based sustainability (ECON-ESG) with additional economic factors (ECON) to ESG on ET can be interpreted as follows. Some economic policies may contradict environmental, social, and government policies. For example, policies encouraging short-term economic growth can damage long-term environmental and social impacts, negatively impacting the energy transition. Adopting a holistic approach that integrates economic, environmental, social, governance, and artificial intelligence factors is critical for policymakers to accelerate energy transition and achieve sustainable development goals.

Journal of the Knowledge EconomyVol. 17(1)
European University of Lefke (TR), Anadolu University (TR), University of South Florida (US), Western Caspian University (AZ), Varendra University (BD), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), Eskişehir City Hospital (TR), Korea University (JP), Baku Eurasian University
Anadolu Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
56.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.