Brain injury metrics and their risk functions in frontal automotive collisions
The TBI risks predicted by the MPS95 IRFs and kinematics-based IRFs derived from the MPS95 IRFs were relatively more aligned with the real-world TBI rates for drivers in the full engagement crash configuration. However, further investigations are needed to minimize the gap between predicted TBI risks and real-world TIB rates. In addition, AIS coding of TBIs has changed through version upgrades, especially for concussion. This change in AIS coding has affected IRFs for AIS1 and AIS2. Further revisions of TBI IRFs will be required in the future if the AIS definitions change.
Authors
- Mitsutoshi Masuda
- Masayuki Yaguchi
- Taotao Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-3822)
- Fusako Sato
- Matthew B. Panzer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4500-9442)
Institutions
- University of Georgia (US)
- Japan Automobile Research Institute (JP)
- University of Virginia (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Traffic Injury Prevention
- Published
- 2025-03-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2470338
- Primary Topic
- Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00