The Nature of Planetary Habitability: A Conceptual History of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

This essay traces the conceptual history of biodiversity and ecosystem services from the late 1970s to the early 2000s. In contrast to recent historical studies that have interpreted biodiversity and ecosystem services as expressions of a liberal paradigm in environmental governance, it argues that the conceptual nexus harbored two distinct, and in some sense diametrically opposed, environmental ideas: one of nature as a set of discrete resources, and the other of nature as a producer of conditions of habitability on a planetary scale. In dialogue with Dipesh Chakrabarty’s concept of the planetary, the essay suggests that the case for habitability that was articulated in debates about biodiversity and ecosystem services is of vital interest for the ongoing discussion of the planetary in the humanities. This case suggests that the common analytical distinction between anthropocentric and nonanthropocentric environmentalisms is unhelpful and should be replaced by a distinction between economistic and noneconomistic approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental History
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734558
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nature of Planetary Habitability: A Conceptual History of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Julia Nordblad
2 citations
Environmental History
Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
8.40
article

The Nature of Planetary Habitability: A Conceptual History of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Julia Nordblad
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This essay traces the conceptual history of biodiversity and ecosystem services from the late 1970s to the early 2000s. In contrast to recent historical studies that have interpreted biodiversity and ecosystem services as expressions of a liberal paradigm in environmental governance, it argues that the conceptual nexus harbored two distinct, and in some sense diametrically opposed, environmental ideas: one of nature as a set of discrete resources, and the other of nature as a producer of conditions of habitability on a planetary scale. In dialogue with Dipesh Chakrabarty’s concept of the planetary, the essay suggests that the case for habitability that was articulated in debates about biodiversity and ecosystem services is of vital interest for the ongoing discussion of the planetary in the humanities. This case suggests that the common analytical distinction between anthropocentric and nonanthropocentric environmentalisms is unhelpful and should be replaced by a distinction between economistic and noneconomistic approaches.

Environmental HistoryVol. 30(2)
Uppsala University (SE)
Harvard University, University of Bern, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, Uppsala Universitet, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.