Advocacy, Bioethics, and Regulating COVID-19 Vaccines for Children Under 5

While COVID-19 vaccines became available quickly for adults and teens in the U.S., children under 5 years old waited an additional year and a half for vaccine access, even though they were often present in congregate settings like daycares and preschools and had the highest rates of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 of any pediatric age group. This paper argues that the vaccination process for children under 5 years old in the U.S., which may have appeared to be merely composed of linear scientific and regulatory steps, was in fact impacted by formal and informal advocacy informed by competing, and at times, under-acknowledged values. In this conceptual philosophical analysis, we identify a necessary but largely untapped role for bioethics in the domains of community and government advocacy at individual, adjacent, and structural levels and to help clarify and navigate competing values and priorities raised in complex cases of health advocacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Advocacy
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70440/001c.131701
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advocacy, Bioethics, and Regulating COVID-19 Vaccines for Children Under 5

Elizabeth Lanphier, Ami Harbin
Journal of Health Advocacy
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

Advocacy, Bioethics, and Regulating COVID-19 Vaccines for Children Under 5

Elizabeth Lanphier, Ami Harbin
article en

Abstract

While COVID-19 vaccines became available quickly for adults and teens in the U.S., children under 5 years old waited an additional year and a half for vaccine access, even though they were often present in congregate settings like daycares and preschools and had the highest rates of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 of any pediatric age group. This paper argues that the vaccination process for children under 5 years old in the U.S., which may have appeared to be merely composed of linear scientific and regulatory steps, was in fact impacted by formal and informal advocacy informed by competing, and at times, under-acknowledged values. In this conceptual philosophical analysis, we identify a necessary but largely untapped role for bioethics in the domains of community and government advocacy at individual, adjacent, and structural levels and to help clarify and navigate competing values and priorities raised in complex cases of health advocacy.

Journal of Health Advocacy
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Oakland University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.