Comparison of machine learning models for rock UCS prediction using measurement while drilling data

Accurately determining the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks is crucial for various rock engineering applications. However, traditional methods of obtaining UCS are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for fractured rock sections. In recent years, using Measurement-while-drilling data to identify UCS has gained traction as an alternative approach. To develop a method that can rapidly, efficiently, and economically estimate UCS across different rock types and engineering conditions based on while-drilling tests, this study compiles a comprehensive dataset from existing literature. The dataset includes drilling parameters and their corresponding UCS values, collected under varying lithologies, strength levels, drill bit types, and drilling conditions. Five machine learning models-multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector regression (SVR), convolutional neural networks (CNN), random trees (RT), and long short-term memory networks (LSTM)-were trained and evaluated. Among these, RT demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 15.851, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.449, a standard deviation of residuals (SDR) of 15.292, and an R² value of 0.959 on the test set. SVR also performed well, with an RMSE of 21.905, an MAE of 17.962, an SDR of 21.144, and an R² value of 0.922. While CNN and LSTM exhibited slightly higher errors, they showed better generalization capabilities across validation and test datasets. Furthermore, the models were validated on an unseen independent dataset, where RT achieved the best results, followed by SVR, while the other methods performed relatively poorly. This study indicates that RT and SVR demonstrate superior suitability for UCS prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93111-4
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of machine learning models for rock UCS prediction using measurement while drilling data

Min Zhao, Xianrui Li, Yachen Xie
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Drilling and Well Engineering
5.73
article

Comparison of machine learning models for rock UCS prediction using measurement while drilling data

Min Zhao, Xianrui Li, Yachen Xie
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Accurately determining the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks is crucial for various rock engineering applications. However, traditional methods of obtaining UCS are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for fractured rock sections. In recent years, using Measurement-while-drilling data to identify UCS has gained traction as an alternative approach. To develop a method that can rapidly, efficiently, and economically estimate UCS across different rock types and engineering conditions based on while-drilling tests, this study compiles a comprehensive dataset from existing literature. The dataset includes drilling parameters and their corresponding UCS values, collected under varying lithologies, strength levels, drill bit types, and drilling conditions. Five machine learning models-multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector regression (SVR), convolutional neural networks (CNN), random trees (RT), and long short-term memory networks (LSTM)-were trained and evaluated. Among these, RT demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 15.851, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.449, a standard deviation of residuals (SDR) of 15.292, and an R² value of 0.959 on the test set. SVR also performed well, with an RMSE of 21.905, an MAE of 17.962, an SDR of 21.144, and an R² value of 0.922. While CNN and LSTM exhibited slightly higher errors, they showed better generalization capabilities across validation and test datasets. Furthermore, the models were validated on an unseen independent dataset, where RT achieved the best results, followed by SVR, while the other methods performed relatively poorly. This study indicates that RT and SVR demonstrate superior suitability for UCS prediction.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
South China University of Technology (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Drilling and Well Engineering
5.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.