Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model for building damages in the Kahramanmaraş 2023 earthquakes sequence based on soil, ground motion and earthquake source-path parameters

Abstract This paper has attempted to determine the weighting levels of the soil and ground motion parameters (engineering bedrock depth (EBd), average shear wave velocity (Vs 30 ), fundamental frequency (f 0 ), peak ground acceleration (PGA), Joyner-Boore distance (R jb ), and epicenter distance (R epi )) in reflecting the actual damage status after the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes, which have a wide impact area of 11 provinces. The analytical hierarchy method (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process, was used to analyze these parameter data sets obtained from 44 Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Türkiye (AFAD) stations (Gaziantep, Hatay, Kahramanmaraş, and Osmaniye). The priority order of the parameters before the analysis was systematically collected. These parameters were categorized into soil, ground motion and earthquake source-path properties. Considering the literature, these characteristics and their combined effects were systematically weighted with AHP under five groups. According to the weighted groups in the scope of the study, the actual damage data can be determined with a minimum accuracy rate of 70% (Group 1). In comparison, the best performance evaluation was 82% (Group 5). The parameter order and weights in the actual damage data evaluation are suggested as EBd-%28, PGA-%24, Vs 30 -%19, R jb -%14, f 0 -%10, and R epi -%5 considering the very high accuracy rate of Group 5. This suggested weighting allows the rapid and effective estimation of the damage distribution after a possible earthquake only with soil, ground motion and earthquake source-path characteristics, even in cases where reliable structure data cannot be obtained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02139-4
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model for building damages in the Kahramanmaraş 2023 earthquakes sequence based on soil, ground motion and earthquake source-path parameters

Mustafa Şenkaya, Ali Silahtar, Hasan Karaaslan
11 citations
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
10.49
article

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model for building damages in the Kahramanmaraş 2023 earthquakes sequence based on soil, ground motion and earthquake source-path parameters

Mustafa Şenkaya, Ali Silahtar, Hasan Karaaslan
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper has attempted to determine the weighting levels of the soil and ground motion parameters (engineering bedrock depth (EBd), average shear wave velocity (Vs 30 ), fundamental frequency (f 0 ), peak ground acceleration (PGA), Joyner-Boore distance (R jb ), and epicenter distance (R epi )) in reflecting the actual damage status after the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes, which have a wide impact area of 11 provinces. The analytical hierarchy method (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process, was used to analyze these parameter data sets obtained from 44 Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Türkiye (AFAD) stations (Gaziantep, Hatay, Kahramanmaraş, and Osmaniye). The priority order of the parameters before the analysis was systematically collected. These parameters were categorized into soil, ground motion and earthquake source-path properties. Considering the literature, these characteristics and their combined effects were systematically weighted with AHP under five groups. According to the weighted groups in the scope of the study, the actual damage data can be determined with a minimum accuracy rate of 70% (Group 1). In comparison, the best performance evaluation was 82% (Group 5). The parameter order and weights in the actual damage data evaluation are suggested as EBd-%28, PGA-%24, Vs 30 -%19, R jb -%14, f 0 -%10, and R epi -%5 considering the very high accuracy rate of Group 5. This suggested weighting allows the rapid and effective estimation of the damage distribution after a possible earthquake only with soil, ground motion and earthquake source-path characteristics, even in cases where reliable structure data cannot be obtained.

Bulletin of Earthquake EngineeringVol. 23(12)
Sakarya University (TR), Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Sakarya Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
10.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.