Infrastructure Investment and Inequality: Evidence from China

ABSTRACT This paper examines whether infrastructure investment can mitigate inequality using Chinese data. The findings indicate that increased infrastructure investment is related to a reduced urban–rural consumption gap. After establishing the primary effect, the analysis delves into exploring the underlying mechanisms. Channel analyses unveil that improved infrastructure can impact the consumption gap by reducing the income gap and facilitating trade. Heterogeneity tests demonstrate that infrastructure investment has a more pronounced marginal effect on the consumption gap in central and western regions compared with eastern and northeastern areas. Additionally, the effect is more prominent in regions with larger income gaps. Overall, our findings suggest a substantial pro‐poor impact of infrastructure investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Economic Research
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12493
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infrastructure Investment and Inequality: Evidence from China

Tao Li, Hu Jingxin
2 citations
Bulletin of Economic Research
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
6.26
article

Infrastructure Investment and Inequality: Evidence from China

Tao Li, Hu Jingxin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines whether infrastructure investment can mitigate inequality using Chinese data. The findings indicate that increased infrastructure investment is related to a reduced urban–rural consumption gap. After establishing the primary effect, the analysis delves into exploring the underlying mechanisms. Channel analyses unveil that improved infrastructure can impact the consumption gap by reducing the income gap and facilitating trade. Heterogeneity tests demonstrate that infrastructure investment has a more pronounced marginal effect on the consumption gap in central and western regions compared with eastern and northeastern areas. Additionally, the effect is more prominent in regions with larger income gaps. Overall, our findings suggest a substantial pro‐poor impact of infrastructure investment.

Bulletin of Economic ResearchVol. 77(3)
University of Houston - Downtown (US), Chongqing University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.