On the uncertain certain: The politics of deepfakes in the counterpoise of the unthought

For McLuhan, ‘all media exist to invest our lives with artificial perceptions and arbitrary values’. Particularly in the wake of AI Chatbots, agents, avatars and simulations, surveillance capitalism, webscraping and strip-mining, conflict has erupted between scientific and non-scientific epistemologies and forms of truth – and ‘fact’ refracted as a slippery ellipses of attestation and testimony. When ‘authority’ is indeterminable; when we have no access to epistemic privilege to who or what is coding, coating, adjudicating; who has expertise when expertise is a discursive process – the question to be addressed is not how do we determine what is true, real, authentic or certain, but how do we collectively negotiate this ever-expanding digital plenitude, taking into account, á la Postman, ways each medium (or platform) ‘calls forth and amplifies certain cognitive, emotional, social, political, economic and aesthetic uses, responses and values’. Techno-aesthetically contextualized within Terry Moran’s ‘graphic revolution’, as read through my highly satiric 2017–23, Checking In ; this probe exposes how when we have no access to epistemic privilege, ‘reality’ becomes an unfixed re-mix; a nexus of excessive axes – enacting the Wittgensteinian axiom, that, ‘at the core of all well-founded belief lies belief that is unfounded’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Explorations in Media Ecology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00226_7
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the uncertain certain: The politics of deepfakes in the counterpoise of the unthought

Adeena Karasick
Explorations in Media Ecology
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

On the uncertain certain: The politics of deepfakes in the counterpoise of the unthought

Adeena Karasick
article en

Abstract

For McLuhan, ‘all media exist to invest our lives with artificial perceptions and arbitrary values’. Particularly in the wake of AI Chatbots, agents, avatars and simulations, surveillance capitalism, webscraping and strip-mining, conflict has erupted between scientific and non-scientific epistemologies and forms of truth – and ‘fact’ refracted as a slippery ellipses of attestation and testimony. When ‘authority’ is indeterminable; when we have no access to epistemic privilege to who or what is coding, coating, adjudicating; who has expertise when expertise is a discursive process – the question to be addressed is not how do we determine what is true, real, authentic or certain, but how do we collectively negotiate this ever-expanding digital plenitude, taking into account, á la Postman, ways each medium (or platform) ‘calls forth and amplifies certain cognitive, emotional, social, political, economic and aesthetic uses, responses and values’. Techno-aesthetically contextualized within Terry Moran’s ‘graphic revolution’, as read through my highly satiric 2017–23, Checking In ; this probe exposes how when we have no access to epistemic privilege, ‘reality’ becomes an unfixed re-mix; a nexus of excessive axes – enacting the Wittgensteinian axiom, that, ‘at the core of all well-founded belief lies belief that is unfounded’.

Explorations in Media EcologyVol. 23(4)
Pratt Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.