Assessment in Higher Education and Student Affairs Graduate Education

Courses focused on assessment within higher education have proliferated across Higher Education and Student Affairs (HESA) graduate programs, tied to an emphasis on using data and evidence in decision making in the field. The intended outcomes and curriculum of these courses vary widely between institutions, at times producing confusion over the competencies needed in student affairs assessment. This project evaluated syllabi from over 100 HESA graduate assessment and evaluation courses to develop a more robust understanding of the skill sets of entry-level student affairs practitioners entering the field from HESA graduate programs and the core outcomes and texts of student affairs assessment education. We describe student affairs as a field engaged in the process of professionalization (Perozzi & Shea, 2023, McGill et al., 2021) through the development of standardized knowledge and the ongoing integration of community-driven standards. Study findings illustrate that courses tended to focus on technical knowledge, such as data collection methods and analysis, over the political and contextual dimensions of assessment. Extant standards and competencies, as well as emerging topics and methods, were also incorporated inconsistently. Implications for faculty, practitioners, early career professionals, and professional associations are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Student Affairs Inquiry Improvement and Impact
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18060/28006
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment in Higher Education and Student Affairs Graduate Education

Paul Holliday-Millard, Joseph Josy Lévy, Tori Rehr, Natasha A. Jankowski et al.
Journal of Student Affairs Inquiry Improvement and Impact
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Assessment in Higher Education and Student Affairs Graduate Education

Paul Holliday-Millard, Joseph Josy Lévy, Tori Rehr, Natasha A. Jankowski, Terry D. Gill, Shaun Boren, Shiloh Lovette
article en

Abstract

Courses focused on assessment within higher education have proliferated across Higher Education and Student Affairs (HESA) graduate programs, tied to an emphasis on using data and evidence in decision making in the field. The intended outcomes and curriculum of these courses vary widely between institutions, at times producing confusion over the competencies needed in student affairs assessment. This project evaluated syllabi from over 100 HESA graduate assessment and evaluation courses to develop a more robust understanding of the skill sets of entry-level student affairs practitioners entering the field from HESA graduate programs and the core outcomes and texts of student affairs assessment education. We describe student affairs as a field engaged in the process of professionalization (Perozzi & Shea, 2023, McGill et al., 2021) through the development of standardized knowledge and the ongoing integration of community-driven standards. Study findings illustrate that courses tended to focus on technical knowledge, such as data collection methods and analysis, over the political and contextual dimensions of assessment. Extant standards and competencies, as well as emerging topics and methods, were also incorporated inconsistently. Implications for faculty, practitioners, early career professionals, and professional associations are discussed.

Journal of Student Affairs Inquiry Improvement and ImpactVol. 7(1)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), University of Florida (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Excelsior College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment in Higher Education and Student Affairs Graduate Education — Paul Holliday-Millard, Joseph Josy Lévy, et al. · Journal of Student Affairs Inquiry Improvement and Impact (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS