Designing for sustainability: A case in corporate philanthropy and evaluative thinking

Given the climate crisis, all sectors must make choices that serve people and planet well into the future. The establishment of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015 shifted the global debates on these issues particularly recognizing that sustainability as a critical lens must be applied not only by public and not-for-profit sectors, but also by philanthropy and private sector. The concept, however; remains obscure and misinterpreted by many, particularly when looking across different sectors - making it challenging to evaluate, compare, and contrast different policies, interventions and programs, and their impact. This article draws on examples of the use of various evaluative tools in the philanthropic and private sectors and showcases how sustainability challenges and potential solutions can been critically analyzed, improved, and set up for the best possible outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation and Program Planning
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102577
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing for sustainability: A case in corporate philanthropy and evaluative thinking

Veronica Olazabal, Alyna Wyatt
1 citations
Evaluation and Program Planning
Community Development and Social Impact
2.21
article

Designing for sustainability: A case in corporate philanthropy and evaluative thinking

Veronica Olazabal, Alyna Wyatt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Given the climate crisis, all sectors must make choices that serve people and planet well into the future. The establishment of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015 shifted the global debates on these issues particularly recognizing that sustainability as a critical lens must be applied not only by public and not-for-profit sectors, but also by philanthropy and private sector. The concept, however; remains obscure and misinterpreted by many, particularly when looking across different sectors - making it challenging to evaluate, compare, and contrast different policies, interventions and programs, and their impact. This article draws on examples of the use of various evaluative tools in the philanthropic and private sectors and showcases how sustainability challenges and potential solutions can been critically analyzed, improved, and set up for the best possible outcomes.

Evaluation and Program PlanningVol. 111
BHP (Australia) (AU)
Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Community Development and Social Impact
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.