Cash holdings in MENA region: evidence from trade-off model, pecking order theory, and agency theory

Abstract This study examines firms’ cash holdings (CH) in the MENA region. For the period 2000–2020, the fixed effect method and GMM are applied to a sample of 1053 non-financial firms. The results show that firms that are large in size, and higher in cash flows, R&D, and dividend payments have higher CH. In contrast, firms with higher growth opportunities, net working capital, financial leverage, and capital expenditures have lower cash. The subsample analyses show that larger firms with higher leverage have higher CH while paying higher dividends reduces CH in these firms. Furthermore, cash flow plays an effective role in small firms, while R&D lowers CH in low-liquidity firms. The majority of the results supported the pecking order theory and the trade-off model, and only a few supported the agency theory. The study identifies major CH determinants in the MENA region by integrating results with the trade-off model, financing hierarchy, and agency theory. The study provides insights into the firm’s decision to hold cash based on transaction costs and precautionary and agency motives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Business Journal
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00454-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cash holdings in MENA region: evidence from trade-off model, pecking order theory, and agency theory

Tahir Akhtar
2 citations
Future Business Journal
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
article

Cash holdings in MENA region: evidence from trade-off model, pecking order theory, and agency theory

Tahir Akhtar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines firms’ cash holdings (CH) in the MENA region. For the period 2000–2020, the fixed effect method and GMM are applied to a sample of 1053 non-financial firms. The results show that firms that are large in size, and higher in cash flows, R&D, and dividend payments have higher CH. In contrast, firms with higher growth opportunities, net working capital, financial leverage, and capital expenditures have lower cash. The subsample analyses show that larger firms with higher leverage have higher CH while paying higher dividends reduces CH in these firms. Furthermore, cash flow plays an effective role in small firms, while R&D lowers CH in low-liquidity firms. The majority of the results supported the pecking order theory and the trade-off model, and only a few supported the agency theory. The study identifies major CH determinants in the MENA region by integrating results with the trade-off model, financing hierarchy, and agency theory. The study provides insights into the firm’s decision to hold cash based on transaction costs and precautionary and agency motives.

Future Business JournalVol. 11(1)
University of Ha'il (SA), University of Business and Technology (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.