Basic income trials and the politics of scale: A research agenda

Abstract The growing popularity of basic income has led to extensive trials of the policy in numerous settings across the world. However, analysis of the politics of basic income, and in particular the political dynamics preceding and resulting from trial programs, lags. In response, we propose a research agenda that uses political scale to investigate where basic income trials emerge, how individual trials' design and implementation parameters vary, and how those trials influence subsequent policy development. By focusing on the previously omitted variable of political scale, our approach addresses a number of key challenges in evaluating basic income trials. First, we provide a means of identifying negative and partial cases to remedy the small‐N problem at the national and regional scales. Second, focusing on a given scale helps to identify specific incumbent programs and policy possibilities influenced by basic income trials. Third, our framework draws attention to the importance of distinct, scale‐based political dynamics in both securing basic income trials and converting trial programs into future policy changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70006
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Basic income trials and the politics of scale: A research agenda

Joe Chrisp, Marc Doussard, Jürgen De Wispelaere
2 citations
Policy Studies Journal
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
8.40
article

Basic income trials and the politics of scale: A research agenda

Joe Chrisp, Marc Doussard, Jürgen De Wispelaere
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The growing popularity of basic income has led to extensive trials of the policy in numerous settings across the world. However, analysis of the politics of basic income, and in particular the political dynamics preceding and resulting from trial programs, lags. In response, we propose a research agenda that uses political scale to investigate where basic income trials emerge, how individual trials' design and implementation parameters vary, and how those trials influence subsequent policy development. By focusing on the previously omitted variable of political scale, our approach addresses a number of key challenges in evaluating basic income trials. First, we provide a means of identifying negative and partial cases to remedy the small‐N problem at the national and regional scales. Second, focusing on a given scale helps to identify specific incumbent programs and policy possibilities influenced by basic income trials. Third, our framework draws attention to the importance of distinct, scale‐based political dynamics in both securing basic income trials and converting trial programs into future policy changes.

Policy Studies Journal
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Basic income trials and the politics of scale: A research agenda — Joe Chrisp, Marc Doussard, et al. · Policy Studies Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS