Reexamining and validating a multicomponent model of in-group identification for college student belonging

We examined the validity and reliability of a model of in-group identification in a new context—university students living in residential commons in the United States. We collected survey data from fall 2020 to spring 2022 and used four cross-sectional and two panel samples in the analysis. First, we used confirmatory factor analysis to determine whether a higher-order factor model or a simpler first-order factor model better fit the data. Second, we used two panel samples to test for measurement invariance in in-group identification over time. Results indicate the simpler factor structure is a better fit to the data. Also, the measure exhibits at least scalar invariance in each panel. Our results produced a simplified version of the in-group identification model, adding to the measurement tools available to assess sense of belonging. Moreover, strong evidence of measurement invariance allows a comparison of mean differences and differences in relationships between variables across time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2476268
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reexamining and validating a multicomponent model of in-group identification for college student belonging

Robert M. Kunovich, Dustin K. Grabsch, Brittany Billar, Abdul Wasay
Cogent Education
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Reexamining and validating a multicomponent model of in-group identification for college student belonging

Robert M. Kunovich, Dustin K. Grabsch, Brittany Billar, Abdul Wasay
article en

Abstract

We examined the validity and reliability of a model of in-group identification in a new context—university students living in residential commons in the United States. We collected survey data from fall 2020 to spring 2022 and used four cross-sectional and two panel samples in the analysis. First, we used confirmatory factor analysis to determine whether a higher-order factor model or a simpler first-order factor model better fit the data. Second, we used two panel samples to test for measurement invariance in in-group identification over time. Results indicate the simpler factor structure is a better fit to the data. Also, the measure exhibits at least scalar invariance in each panel. Our results produced a simplified version of the in-group identification model, adding to the measurement tools available to assess sense of belonging. Moreover, strong evidence of measurement invariance allows a comparison of mean differences and differences in relationships between variables across time.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
Southern Methodist University (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Southern Methodist University
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.