The impact of river capture on fluvial terraces and bedrock incision

Abstract River terraces are commonly used to infer climate and tectonic histories. Yet, it is increasingly recognised that other processes, such as river capture, can affect river terrace genesis and incision rates and patterns. In this study, we conduct a field‐based investigation of river terrace sequences along the Kolokithas and Varitis Rivers in central Crete, Greece, that share a confluence and preserve geomorphic evidence for the recent capture of the Kolokithas headwaters by the Varitis. We use digital topographic analysis, mapping, and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) geochronology to quantify the river terrace and bedrock incision response to river capture. Topographic analysis indicates the Varitis captured ~30 km 2 of drainage area from the Kolokithas. We find differences in terrace characteristics, number of terraces, and incision rates and patterns on the adjacent valleys. The Kolokithas has four terrace levels, and the Varitis has five. All terraces are strath terraces, except for the oldest on the Kolokithas, a ~8 m thick fill terrace that starkly contrasts the time‐equivalent ~1–2 m thick strath terrace on the Varitis. Relative and absolute age control suggests three Pleistocene terraces were emplaced during cooler climate intervals, and two Holocene terraces are perhaps because of anthropogenic disturbances. The incision patterns differ on each valley, with generally more incision upstream on the Varitis relative to the Kolokithas. Incision rates on the Varitis are roughly twice as high as on the Kolokithas, but the average incision rate of both valleys combined is comparable to coastal rock uplift rates derived from marine terraces. Collectively, our results suggest that fluvial systems are sensitive to climate and tectonic processes even when affected by geomorphic disturbances, like river capture and beheading. However, care must be taken when interpreting river terraces as direct records of climate and tectonic processes, particularly when working on a single river valley.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.70035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of river capture on fluvial terraces and bedrock incision

Sean F. Gallen, Karl W. Wegmann
1 citations
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Geological formations and processes
1.67
article

The impact of river capture on fluvial terraces and bedrock incision

Sean F. Gallen, Karl W. Wegmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract River terraces are commonly used to infer climate and tectonic histories. Yet, it is increasingly recognised that other processes, such as river capture, can affect river terrace genesis and incision rates and patterns. In this study, we conduct a field‐based investigation of river terrace sequences along the Kolokithas and Varitis Rivers in central Crete, Greece, that share a confluence and preserve geomorphic evidence for the recent capture of the Kolokithas headwaters by the Varitis. We use digital topographic analysis, mapping, and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) geochronology to quantify the river terrace and bedrock incision response to river capture. Topographic analysis indicates the Varitis captured ~30 km 2 of drainage area from the Kolokithas. We find differences in terrace characteristics, number of terraces, and incision rates and patterns on the adjacent valleys. The Kolokithas has four terrace levels, and the Varitis has five. All terraces are strath terraces, except for the oldest on the Kolokithas, a ~8 m thick fill terrace that starkly contrasts the time‐equivalent ~1–2 m thick strath terrace on the Varitis. Relative and absolute age control suggests three Pleistocene terraces were emplaced during cooler climate intervals, and two Holocene terraces are perhaps because of anthropogenic disturbances. The incision patterns differ on each valley, with generally more incision upstream on the Varitis relative to the Kolokithas. Incision rates on the Varitis are roughly twice as high as on the Kolokithas, but the average incision rate of both valleys combined is comparable to coastal rock uplift rates derived from marine terraces. Collectively, our results suggest that fluvial systems are sensitive to climate and tectonic processes even when affected by geomorphic disturbances, like river capture and beheading. However, care must be taken when interpreting river terraces as direct records of climate and tectonic processes, particularly when working on a single river valley.

Earth Surface Processes and LandformsVol. 50(3)
North Carolina State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Geological Society of America, Sigma Xia, American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geological formations and processes
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.