Antarctic Water Stable Isotopes in the Global Atmospheric Model LMDZ6: From Climatology to Boundary Layer Processes

Abstract Observations of water stable isotopes in Antarctic surface snow, precipitation and water vapor are key for improving our understanding of the atmospheric water cycle and past climate reconstructions from ice cores. In this study, we use isotopic observations in Antarctica to assess the skill of the isotope‐enabled atmospheric general circulation model LMDZ6, nudged to ERA5 above the boundary layer (1980–2023 period). The model has no significant bias for time‐mean temperature and snow accumulation over the ice sheet. Sensitivity test on parameterized supersaturation strength highlights its opposite effect on precipitation O and d‐excess. Selecting an intermediate supersaturation strength resulted in a minimal bias for surface snow O across the continent, with a reduced but systematic positive bias in surface snow d‐excess (5‰). We then assessed seasonal and diurnal isotope variability with daily precipitation and continuous vapor isotopes at Dumont d’Urville (DDU, coastal station) and Concordia (inland station). On a seasonal scale, LMDZ6iso accurately reproduces the seasonal cycle of precipitation O and d‐excess at both stations. Moving from statistical evaluation to physical analysis, we use the individual process contributions to boundary‐layer water vapor isotopes to identify the main drivers controlling the clear‐sky isotopic daily cycles. At Concordia, daily isotope variations are mainly driven by surface sublimation, whereas at DDU they are driven by surface sublimation and advection by the katabatic flow. Our results suggest that to further improve water isotopes in LMDZ6iso, fractionation during surface sublimation should be included and fractionation at condensation for low temperature should be better constrained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042073
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antarctic Water Stable Isotopes in the Global Atmospheric Model LMDZ6: From Climatology to Boundary Layer Processes

Inès Ollivier, Mauro Masiol, Élise Fourré, Étienne Vignon et al.
5 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
5.53
article

Antarctic Water Stable Isotopes in the Global Atmospheric Model LMDZ6: From Climatology to Boundary Layer Processes

Inès Ollivier, Mauro Masiol, Élise Fourré, Étienne Vignon, Thomas Dubos, Camille Risi, Sébastien Nguyen, Amaëlle Landais, Mathieu Casado, Barbara Stenni, Valérie Masson‐Delmotte, Cécile Agosta, Niels Dutrievoz, Giuliano Dreossi, Christophe Leroy‐Dos Santos, Frédéric Prié, Bénédicte Minster, J. Jouzel
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Observations of water stable isotopes in Antarctic surface snow, precipitation and water vapor are key for improving our understanding of the atmospheric water cycle and past climate reconstructions from ice cores. In this study, we use isotopic observations in Antarctica to assess the skill of the isotope‐enabled atmospheric general circulation model LMDZ6, nudged to ERA5 above the boundary layer (1980–2023 period). The model has no significant bias for time‐mean temperature and snow accumulation over the ice sheet. Sensitivity test on parameterized supersaturation strength highlights its opposite effect on precipitation O and d‐excess. Selecting an intermediate supersaturation strength resulted in a minimal bias for surface snow O across the continent, with a reduced but systematic positive bias in surface snow d‐excess (5‰). We then assessed seasonal and diurnal isotope variability with daily precipitation and continuous vapor isotopes at Dumont d’Urville (DDU, coastal station) and Concordia (inland station). On a seasonal scale, LMDZ6iso accurately reproduces the seasonal cycle of precipitation O and d‐excess at both stations. Moving from statistical evaluation to physical analysis, we use the individual process contributions to boundary‐layer water vapor isotopes to identify the main drivers controlling the clear‐sky isotopic daily cycles. At Concordia, daily isotope variations are mainly driven by surface sublimation, whereas at DDU they are driven by surface sublimation and advection by the katabatic flow. Our results suggest that to further improve water isotopes in LMDZ6iso, fractionation during surface sublimation should be included and fractionation at condensation for low temperature should be better constrained.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Polytechnique (FR), Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), University of Bergen (NO)
Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.