Asynchronous time-based indoor localization systems—Comparative analysis under realistic industrial-oriented conditions

The growing need for accurate localization in increasingly interconnected industrial environments has driven research towards developing new indoor localization systems. This work analyzes and compares three asynchronous localization methods based on the Two-Way-Ranging (TWR) protocol: Single-Sided TWR (SS-TWR), Symmetric Double-Sided TWR (SDS-TWR), and Alternative Double-Sided TWR (AltDS-TWR) in addition to the Asynchronous Time Difference of Arrival (A-TDOA) system. Similar comparisons have been previously reported, however, these only take into consideration clock-associated errors and unrealistic test conditions, thus overlooking the impact of signal paths required by each method, therefore reaching conclusions far from those expected in real applications. In this paper, we propose a more complete and fair comparison among these four asynchronous systems. For this purpose, we propose a clock, noise, and multipath error characterization for each localization system to perform a realistic comparison over multiple industrial scenarios where Autonomous Mobile Robots freely navigate. In order to ensure a fair comparison, a sensor distribution optimization has been carried out for attaining the best achievable performance of each analyzed system. Results show that the selection of the best localization system may depend on the scenario and application conditions as well as the deployment budget. Nevertheless, results from the AltDS-TWR method highlight the potential of this system, yet further research should be conducted to verify the influence of moving targets for this TWR method. • The error-bounds characterization of the SS-TWR, SDS-TWR, AltDS-TWR methods and the A-TDOA localization systems under noise, multipath and clock-related errors in indoor environments. • The proposal of a realistic comparison of the attainable performance among the 4 characterized localization systems over an industrial scenario of deployment under different conditions. • The optimization of the compared sensor distributions in accordance with the respective path and clock related error-bounds for guaranteeing a fair comparison among the 4 localization systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ad Hoc Networks
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2025.103816
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asynchronous time-based indoor localization systems—Comparative analysis under realistic industrial-oriented conditions

Rubén Álvarez, Adriano Moreira, Hilde Pérez, Rubén Ferrero-Guillén et al.
2 citations
Ad Hoc Networks
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
1.46
article

Asynchronous time-based indoor localization systems—Comparative analysis under realistic industrial-oriented conditions

Rubén Álvarez, Adriano Moreira, Hilde Pérez, Rubén Ferrero-Guillén, Joaquín Torres-Sospedra, Javier Díez-González
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The growing need for accurate localization in increasingly interconnected industrial environments has driven research towards developing new indoor localization systems. This work analyzes and compares three asynchronous localization methods based on the Two-Way-Ranging (TWR) protocol: Single-Sided TWR (SS-TWR), Symmetric Double-Sided TWR (SDS-TWR), and Alternative Double-Sided TWR (AltDS-TWR) in addition to the Asynchronous Time Difference of Arrival (A-TDOA) system. Similar comparisons have been previously reported, however, these only take into consideration clock-associated errors and unrealistic test conditions, thus overlooking the impact of signal paths required by each method, therefore reaching conclusions far from those expected in real applications. In this paper, we propose a more complete and fair comparison among these four asynchronous systems. For this purpose, we propose a clock, noise, and multipath error characterization for each localization system to perform a realistic comparison over multiple industrial scenarios where Autonomous Mobile Robots freely navigate. In order to ensure a fair comparison, a sensor distribution optimization has been carried out for attaining the best achievable performance of each analyzed system. Results show that the selection of the best localization system may depend on the scenario and application conditions as well as the deployment budget. Nevertheless, results from the AltDS-TWR method highlight the potential of this system, yet further research should be conducted to verify the influence of moving targets for this TWR method. • The error-bounds characterization of the SS-TWR, SDS-TWR, AltDS-TWR methods and the A-TDOA localization systems under noise, multipath and clock-related errors in indoor environments. • The proposal of a realistic comparison of the attainable performance among the 4 characterized localization systems over an industrial scenario of deployment under different conditions. • The optimization of the compared sensor distributions in accordance with the respective path and clock related error-bounds for guaranteeing a fair comparison among the 4 localization systems.

Ad Hoc NetworksVol. 173
Universitat de València (ES), Universidad de León (ES), University of Minho (PT)
Generalitat Valenciana, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León, Universidad de León
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.