Half a Century of Public Sector Accounting Research Through Bibliometric Analysis: Looking Back to Move Forward

ABSTRACT This literature review aims to highlight the themes and the developments of public sector accounting (PSA) research over the last five decades (1970–2019), analyzing 2187 papers though a combination of bibliometric (co‐word) analysis and qualitative insights into the selected papers. The review shows that PSA scholarship has grown in significance over the last few decades giving rise to a vibrant and variegated scientific community, flourishing at the intersection among but also increasingly spanning across, different disciplines. Moreover, it reveals that traditional themes such as budgeting, performance measurement, and accountability remained at the core of the literature across most of the decades, attracting attention from multiple communities and journals. Other themes, such as accruals accounting, accounting standards, reporting, and auditing experienced varied interest over the decades and reflected the interests of more specialized, or “niche” communities of scholarship. By looking at the trends of PSA over time, the paper shows how accounting systems and calculative practices have come to reflect and affect the multiple values and the need for quantifying techniques of an ever‐evolving public sector. A call for more attention toward accounting for multiple and plural values is advanced, with suggestions for future research avenues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Accountability and Management
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12432
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Half a Century of Public Sector Accounting Research Through Bibliometric Analysis: Looking Back to Move Forward

Giuseppe Grossi, Sara Giovanna Mauro, Ileana Steccolini, Carmela Barbera et al.
2 citations
Financial Accountability and Management
Accounting and Organizational Management
4.57
article

Half a Century of Public Sector Accounting Research Through Bibliometric Analysis: Looking Back to Move Forward

Giuseppe Grossi, Sara Giovanna Mauro, Ileana Steccolini, Carmela Barbera, Mariafrancesca Sicilia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This literature review aims to highlight the themes and the developments of public sector accounting (PSA) research over the last five decades (1970–2019), analyzing 2187 papers though a combination of bibliometric (co‐word) analysis and qualitative insights into the selected papers. The review shows that PSA scholarship has grown in significance over the last few decades giving rise to a vibrant and variegated scientific community, flourishing at the intersection among but also increasingly spanning across, different disciplines. Moreover, it reveals that traditional themes such as budgeting, performance measurement, and accountability remained at the core of the literature across most of the decades, attracting attention from multiple communities and journals. Other themes, such as accruals accounting, accounting standards, reporting, and auditing experienced varied interest over the decades and reflected the interests of more specialized, or “niche” communities of scholarship. By looking at the trends of PSA over time, the paper shows how accounting systems and calculative practices have come to reflect and affect the multiple values and the need for quantifying techniques of an ever‐evolving public sector. A call for more attention toward accounting for multiple and plural values is advanced, with suggestions for future research avenues.

Financial Accountability and ManagementVol. 41(3)
University of Essex (GB), University of Bergamo (IT), Kozminski University (PL), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Kristianstad University (SE), Nord University (NO), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Accounting and Organizational Management
4.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.