Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Survey

Quality assessment, which evaluates the visual quality level of multimedia experiences, has garnered significant attention from researchers and has evolved substantially through dedicated efforts. Before the advent of large models, quality assessment typically relied on small expert models tailored for specific tasks. While these smaller models are effective at handling their designated tasks and predicting quality levels, they often lack explainability and robustness. With the advancement of large models, which align more closely with human cognitive and perceptual processes, many researchers are now leveraging the prior knowledge embedded in these large models for quality assessment tasks. This emergence of quality assessment within the context of large models motivates us to provide a comprehensive review focusing on two key aspects: (1) the assessment of large models and (2) the role of large models in assessment tasks. We begin by reflecting on the historical development of quality assessment. Subsequently, we move to detailed discussions of related works concerning quality assessment in the era of large models. Finally, we offer insights into the future progression and potential pathways for quality assessment in this new era. We hope that this survey will enable a rapid understanding of the development of quality assessment in the era of large models and inspire further advancements in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3722559
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Image and Video Quality Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Survey

Chunyi Li, Baixuan Zhao, Guangtao Zhai, Xiaohong Liu et al.
15 citations
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
Image and Video Quality Assessment
19.14
article

Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Survey

Chunyi Li, Baixuan Zhao, Guangtao Zhai, Xiaohong Liu, Yingjie Zhou, Zicheng Zhang
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Quality assessment, which evaluates the visual quality level of multimedia experiences, has garnered significant attention from researchers and has evolved substantially through dedicated efforts. Before the advent of large models, quality assessment typically relied on small expert models tailored for specific tasks. While these smaller models are effective at handling their designated tasks and predicting quality levels, they often lack explainability and robustness. With the advancement of large models, which align more closely with human cognitive and perceptual processes, many researchers are now leveraging the prior knowledge embedded in these large models for quality assessment tasks. This emergence of quality assessment within the context of large models motivates us to provide a comprehensive review focusing on two key aspects: (1) the assessment of large models and (2) the role of large models in assessment tasks. We begin by reflecting on the historical development of quality assessment. Subsequently, we move to detailed discussions of related works concerning quality assessment in the era of large models. Finally, we offer insights into the future progression and potential pathways for quality assessment in this new era. We hope that this survey will enable a rapid understanding of the development of quality assessment in the era of large models and inspire further advancements in the field.

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsVol. 21(7)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Image and Video Quality Assessment
19.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.