Evaluation of Bone Cancer Treatment Techniques

Bone cancer is a serious morbidity and mortality factor that occurs in rare cases with less than ${1 \%}$ prevalence across all cancers. Despite being rare, bone cancer has a mortality rate, accounting for less than ${1 \%}$ of deaths worldwide and claiming about ${2, 1 0 0}$ people in the United States in 2022. This includes cancers in both adults and children. Most mortality cases are traced to the late detection of tumors and wrong systematic diagnostic and therapeutic decisional approaches deployed either by the concerned physicians, patients, or close associates. To circumvent the hurdles associated with poor therapeutic decision-making, relating to bone cancers and to eliminate scenarios associated with uncertainties in any decision-making platform, this study proposed the multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method called fuzzy preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) to compare, evaluate, and rank conventional and modern treatment approaches for bone cancer. Results from this study showed that, with a net flow of 0.1737, Radiofrequency was determined as the most preferred and most favorable treatment approach for bone cancer. Surgery, Cryotherapy, Immunotherapy, and Radiation therapy came second, third, fourth, and fifth with net flows of $0.1309,-0.0154,-0.0797$, and −0.0902 respectively. Chemotherapy with a net flow of $-{0 . 1 1 9 3}$ was the least preferred treatment alternative. However, the outranking results may differ if different weight preference functions are assigned to each selected criterion

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/dese63988.2024.10911950
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Bone Cancer Treatment Techniques

Dilber Uzun Ozsahin, Efe Precious Onakpojeruo, Leena R. David, Berna Uzun et al.
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Evaluation of Bone Cancer Treatment Techniques

Dilber Uzun Ozsahin, Efe Precious Onakpojeruo, Leena R. David, Berna Uzun, İlker Özşahin, Christiana Chioma Efe
article en

Abstract

Bone cancer is a serious morbidity and mortality factor that occurs in rare cases with less than ${1 \%}$ prevalence across all cancers. Despite being rare, bone cancer has a mortality rate, accounting for less than ${1 \%}$ of deaths worldwide and claiming about ${2, 1 0 0}$ people in the United States in 2022. This includes cancers in both adults and children. Most mortality cases are traced to the late detection of tumors and wrong systematic diagnostic and therapeutic decisional approaches deployed either by the concerned physicians, patients, or close associates. To circumvent the hurdles associated with poor therapeutic decision-making, relating to bone cancers and to eliminate scenarios associated with uncertainties in any decision-making platform, this study proposed the multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method called fuzzy preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) to compare, evaluate, and rank conventional and modern treatment approaches for bone cancer. Results from this study showed that, with a net flow of 0.1737, Radiofrequency was determined as the most preferred and most favorable treatment approach for bone cancer. Surgery, Cryotherapy, Immunotherapy, and Radiation therapy came second, third, fourth, and fifth with net flows of $0.1309,-0.0154,-0.0797$, and −0.0902 respectively. Chemotherapy with a net flow of $-{0 . 1 1 9 3}$ was the least preferred treatment alternative. However, the outranking results may differ if different weight preference functions are assigned to each selected criterion

University of Sharjah (AE), Near East University (CY)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Bone Cancer Treatment Techniques — Dilber Uzun Ozsahin, Efe Precious Onakpojeruo, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS