Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is a resilient crop known for its ability to thrive in arid and semi-arid regions, making it a crucial staple in regions prone to drought. Rajasthan, a state in India, emerged as the top producer of pearl millet. This study enhances yield forecasting for pearl millet using machine learning models across nine districts viz. Jaipur, Ajmer, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Bharatpur, Alwar, Sikar, Jhunjhunu and Nagaur in Rajasthan, India. Data from 1997-2019 (23 years), including yield data from the Directorate of Economics and Statistics and weather data from the NASA POWER web portal, were analysed. The study employed individual machine learning methods (GLM, ELNET, XGB, SVR and RF) and their ensemble combinations (GLM, ELNET, Cubist and RF). Discerning the overall best performing model across all locations remained challenging. For instance, while ensemble models exhibited subpar performance in Barmer and Nagaur, their performance ranged from satisfactory to commendable in other locations. To identify the best model, all models were ranked based on their R2 and nRMSE (%) values. Combined average ranks during training and testing revealed the model performance ranking as I-XGB (3.83) > I-GLM (4.28) > E-ELNET (4.32) > I-RF (4.67) > E-GLM (4.88) > I-SVR (4.90) > I-ELNET (4.94) > E-RF (6.03) > E-Cubist (7.15), where I denotes individual model, while E denotes ensemble model. Intriguingly, while individual GLM and XGB models demonstrated superior performance during calibration, they exhibited poorer performance during validation, potentially indicating issues of data overfitting. Hence, the ensemble ELNET approach is recommended for accurate prediction of pearl millet yield, followed by the individual RF model. These performances underscore the importance of tailored model selection based on specific geographic and environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317602
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India

Parul Setiya, Abrar Aljamaan, Anurag Satpathi, Jiazhu Pan et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
3.43
article

Advancing pearl millet yield forecasting: Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble machine learning approaches over Rajasthan, India

Parul Setiya, Abrar Aljamaan, Anurag Satpathi, Jiazhu Pan, Ahmad Alsaber
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) is a resilient crop known for its ability to thrive in arid and semi-arid regions, making it a crucial staple in regions prone to drought. Rajasthan, a state in India, emerged as the top producer of pearl millet. This study enhances yield forecasting for pearl millet using machine learning models across nine districts viz. Jaipur, Ajmer, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Bharatpur, Alwar, Sikar, Jhunjhunu and Nagaur in Rajasthan, India. Data from 1997-2019 (23 years), including yield data from the Directorate of Economics and Statistics and weather data from the NASA POWER web portal, were analysed. The study employed individual machine learning methods (GLM, ELNET, XGB, SVR and RF) and their ensemble combinations (GLM, ELNET, Cubist and RF). Discerning the overall best performing model across all locations remained challenging. For instance, while ensemble models exhibited subpar performance in Barmer and Nagaur, their performance ranged from satisfactory to commendable in other locations. To identify the best model, all models were ranked based on their R2 and nRMSE (%) values. Combined average ranks during training and testing revealed the model performance ranking as I-XGB (3.83) > I-GLM (4.28) > E-ELNET (4.32) > I-RF (4.67) > E-GLM (4.88) > I-SVR (4.90) > I-ELNET (4.94) > E-RF (6.03) > E-Cubist (7.15), where I denotes individual model, while E denotes ensemble model. Intriguingly, while individual GLM and XGB models demonstrated superior performance during calibration, they exhibited poorer performance during validation, potentially indicating issues of data overfitting. Hence, the ensemble ELNET approach is recommended for accurate prediction of pearl millet yield, followed by the individual RF model. These performances underscore the importance of tailored model selection based on specific geographic and environmental conditions.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(3)
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (IN), University of Strathclyde (GB), Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology (IN), American University of Kuwait (KW)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.