How Iran aligned militias seized Iraq: irregular warfare, lawfare and regime change

Militia groups are a major tool of Iranian influence in Iraq. Over the past decade, these Iranian aligned militia groups have worked to capture Iraqi state institutions. Today, militia state capture has advanced in sophistication and breadth to such a degree that it has become extraordinarily difficult to disentangle illicit militia activity from that of the Iraqi state institutions and political parties. This paper argues that though the militias are fundamentally military actors, often conducting activities clearly identifiable as irregular warfare, their most impactful actions came through the masterful deployment of non-military activities, especially lawfare combined with elite and institutional capture (most notably, through parts of the Iraqi judiciary). The paper argues that these non-kinetic activities should be seen as part of a broad and effective irregular warfare strategy deployed in Iraq, guided by Iran, and potentially replicable in other contexts by U.S. adversaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2025.2471644
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Iran aligned militias seized Iraq: irregular warfare, lawfare and regime change

Michael Knights, Cyril Stanley Smith
1 citations
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
article

How Iran aligned militias seized Iraq: irregular warfare, lawfare and regime change

Michael Knights, Cyril Stanley Smith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Militia groups are a major tool of Iranian influence in Iraq. Over the past decade, these Iranian aligned militia groups have worked to capture Iraqi state institutions. Today, militia state capture has advanced in sophistication and breadth to such a degree that it has become extraordinarily difficult to disentangle illicit militia activity from that of the Iraqi state institutions and political parties. This paper argues that though the militias are fundamentally military actors, often conducting activities clearly identifiable as irregular warfare, their most impactful actions came through the masterful deployment of non-military activities, especially lawfare combined with elite and institutional capture (most notably, through parts of the Iraqi judiciary). The paper argues that these non-kinetic activities should be seen as part of a broad and effective irregular warfare strategy deployed in Iraq, guided by Iran, and potentially replicable in other contexts by U.S. adversaries.

Small Wars and InsurgenciesVol. 36(4)
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Iran aligned militias seized Iraq: irregular warfare, lawfare and regime change — Michael Knights, Cyril Stanley Smith · Small Wars and Insurgencies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS