Pedagogical practices promoting the development of wisdom in university students

Dealing with complex problems requires of future professionals more than knowledge, skills and expertise; it requires wisdom. Recently, the question how to develop wisdom in university students has been raised. Most theoretical models of wisdom include cognitive, affective-social, ethical-existential and action dimensions. The aim of this study was to examine (1) whether the four-dimensional theoretical structure of the wisdom concept can be empirically verified in the higher education context, and (2) what kinds of pedagogical practices explain the development of attributes related to wisdom in university students. Participants of the study were third-year university students (n = 535) representing several disciplines. Data were collected through a survey in which students evaluated their development in wisdom attributes with 46 items and answered 57 items concerning pedagogical practices used on their courses. Exploratory factor analysis and regression analysis were used to analyse the data. The analyses concerning the four-dimensional model of wisdom yielded four factors: cognitive, ethical–existential, affective, and social dimensions, thus partly verifying the theoretical structure. Regarding the pedagogical practices, activities aimed at developing scientific thinking, and sharing and learning from practical experiences explained most the development of attributes of wisdom. Collaboration between students, independent studying, and integration of theory and practice also played an important role. In general, diverse forms of teaching and learning seem to be crucial for the development of prerequisites of wisdom in higher education. Practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2476160
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedagogical practices promoting the development of wisdom in university students

Maija Gerlander, Eeva Kallio, Päivi Tynjälä, Peppi Taalas et al.
2 citations
Studies in Higher Education
Aging and Gerontology Research
7.20
article

Pedagogical practices promoting the development of wisdom in university students

Maija Gerlander, Eeva Kallio, Päivi Tynjälä, Peppi Taalas, Anne Virtanen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Dealing with complex problems requires of future professionals more than knowledge, skills and expertise; it requires wisdom. Recently, the question how to develop wisdom in university students has been raised. Most theoretical models of wisdom include cognitive, affective-social, ethical-existential and action dimensions. The aim of this study was to examine (1) whether the four-dimensional theoretical structure of the wisdom concept can be empirically verified in the higher education context, and (2) what kinds of pedagogical practices explain the development of attributes related to wisdom in university students. Participants of the study were third-year university students (n = 535) representing several disciplines. Data were collected through a survey in which students evaluated their development in wisdom attributes with 46 items and answered 57 items concerning pedagogical practices used on their courses. Exploratory factor analysis and regression analysis were used to analyse the data. The analyses concerning the four-dimensional model of wisdom yielded four factors: cognitive, ethical–existential, affective, and social dimensions, thus partly verifying the theoretical structure. Regarding the pedagogical practices, activities aimed at developing scientific thinking, and sharing and learning from practical experiences explained most the development of attributes of wisdom. Collaboration between students, independent studying, and integration of theory and practice also played an important role. In general, diverse forms of teaching and learning seem to be crucial for the development of prerequisites of wisdom in higher education. Practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Studies in Higher EducationVol. 51(3)
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Academy of Finland
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Aging and Gerontology Research
7.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.