A Survey of Mammal and Fish Genetic Diversity Across the Global Protected Area Network

ABSTRACT Global conservation targets aim to expand protected areas and maintain species’ genetic diversity. Whether protected areas capture genetic diversity is unclear. We examined this question using a global sample of nuclear population‐level microsatellite data comprising genotypes from 2513 sites, 134,183 individuals, and 176 mammal and marine fish species. The genetic diversity and differentiation of samples inside and outside protected areas were similar, with some evidence for higher diversity in protected areas for small‐bodied mammals. Mammal populations, particularly large species, tended to be more genetically diverse when near multiple protected areas, regardless of whether samples were collected in or outside protected areas. Older marine protected areas tended to capture more genetically diverse fish populations. However, limited data availability in many regions hinders the systematic incorporation of genetic diversity into protected area design. Focusing on minimizing population decline and maintaining connectivity between protected areas remain essential proxies for maintaining genetic diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Letters
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13092
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Survey of Mammal and Fish Genetic Diversity Across the Global Protected Area Network

Colin J. Garroway, Chloé Schmidt, Deborah M. Leigh, David O’Brien et al.
7 citations
Conservation Letters
Genetic diversity and population structure
12.72
article

A Survey of Mammal and Fish Genetic Diversity Across the Global Protected Area Network

Colin J. Garroway, Chloé Schmidt, Deborah M. Leigh, David O’Brien, Eric D. Crandall, Margaret E. Hunter, Amy G. Vandergast, Francine Kershaw, Gernot Segelbacher, Ivan Paz‐Vinas, Jeff Falgout, Eleana Karachaliou
article en
7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Global conservation targets aim to expand protected areas and maintain species’ genetic diversity. Whether protected areas capture genetic diversity is unclear. We examined this question using a global sample of nuclear population‐level microsatellite data comprising genotypes from 2513 sites, 134,183 individuals, and 176 mammal and marine fish species. The genetic diversity and differentiation of samples inside and outside protected areas were similar, with some evidence for higher diversity in protected areas for small‐bodied mammals. Mammal populations, particularly large species, tended to be more genetically diverse when near multiple protected areas, regardless of whether samples were collected in or outside protected areas. Older marine protected areas tended to capture more genetically diverse fish populations. However, limited data availability in many regions hinders the systematic incorporation of genetic diversity into protected area design. Focusing on minimizing population decline and maintaining connectivity between protected areas remain essential proxies for maintaining genetic diversity.

Conservation LettersVol. 18(2)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), United States Geological Survey (US), Dalhousie University (CA), Pennsylvania State University (US), Natural Resources Defense Council (US), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE), LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (DE), Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Science Analytics and Synthesis, University of Manitoba (CA)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität Leipzig, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig, U.S. Geological Survey, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Genetic diversity and population structure
12.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.