Artificial intelligence as a tool for cognitive impairment screening: Patient perspectives about benefits and limitations

Abstract Introduction This paper presents findings from a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of primary care patients on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to synthesize data from the electronic medical record (EMR) and audio recordings of patient speech as a way to detect cognitive impairment. Methods We conducted qualitative interviews with a racially and educationally diverse sample of primary care patients ( N = 31) from a large healthcare system in New York City, New York. Interviews focused on the use of AI to synthesize data from the EMR and audio recordings of patient speech. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Results Participants reported that AI technology could improve diagnostic accuracy and avoid human errors in the evaluation and diagnosis of cognitive impairment, while also improving clinical efficiency for clinicians. They also expressed concerns about the use of AI tools for screening, such as risk of misdiagnosis, loss of confidentiality, and psychological distress from learning of detected cognitive impairment. Conclusion The perceived benefits reported by participants regarding the use of AI screening tools suggest that some patients might support the provision of AI screening in clinical settings. However, participants’ concerns about the potential harms of AI screening tools underscore the need for clear and transparent communication about how results are generated and interpreted. Clinicians need training and other forms of structural support to improve their literacy in AI‐driven tools and their ability to integrate adequate approaches to information sharing into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsa3.70005
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence as a tool for cognitive impairment screening: Patient perspectives about benefits and limitations

Alex D. Federman, Jalayne J. Arias, Heather M. Wurtz, Hugo H. Hanson et al.
4 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
article

Artificial intelligence as a tool for cognitive impairment screening: Patient perspectives about benefits and limitations

Alex D. Federman, Jalayne J. Arias, Heather M. Wurtz, Hugo H. Hanson, Tatyana Valteau, Catherine Scipion
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction This paper presents findings from a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of primary care patients on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to synthesize data from the electronic medical record (EMR) and audio recordings of patient speech as a way to detect cognitive impairment. Methods We conducted qualitative interviews with a racially and educationally diverse sample of primary care patients ( N = 31) from a large healthcare system in New York City, New York. Interviews focused on the use of AI to synthesize data from the EMR and audio recordings of patient speech. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Results Participants reported that AI technology could improve diagnostic accuracy and avoid human errors in the evaluation and diagnosis of cognitive impairment, while also improving clinical efficiency for clinicians. They also expressed concerns about the use of AI tools for screening, such as risk of misdiagnosis, loss of confidentiality, and psychological distress from learning of detected cognitive impairment. Conclusion The perceived benefits reported by participants regarding the use of AI screening tools suggest that some patients might support the provision of AI screening in clinical settings. However, participants’ concerns about the potential harms of AI screening tools underscore the need for clear and transparent communication about how results are generated and interpreted. Clinicians need training and other forms of structural support to improve their literacy in AI‐driven tools and their ability to integrate adequate approaches to information sharing into clinical practice.

Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of AgingVol. 1(1)
University of Southern California (US), University of Connecticut (US), Georgia State University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.