Polypropylene fiber assessment for achieving optimal toughness in sustainable tunnel lining selection with various concrete matrices

Abstract This study evaluates the performance of polypropylene (PP) fiber‐reinforced concrete mixes for tunnel‐lining applications, using four concrete types: pervious, moderate strength, high‐performance, and ultra‐high‐performance. The mixes incorporate fiber dosages up to 1.0% by volume, except for ultra‐high‐performance concrete, which includes up to 2.7%. Performance is assessed through flexural tests on 72 panels, following european standard (EN) 14488‐5 and American society for testing and materials (ASTM) 1550 standards. The findings show that fiber addition boosts energy absorption in pervious concrete, but volumes under 9 kg/m 3 (Vf‐1%) do not meet toughness criteria. A 24 kg/m 3 (Vf‐2.7%) fiber dosage also falls short, suggesting a need for a stronger matrix. Statistical analysis produced precise prediction equations ( R 2 >92%) for energy absorption, factoring in cementitious materials, water‐to‐cement ratio, fiber dosage, and aggregate ratio. These equations serve as valuable tools for predicting the performance of fiber‐reinforced concrete (FRC) mixtures based on concrete composition and fiber dosages. Notably, both square and round panel tests demonstrate a strong correlation ( R 2 = 94%) with respect to energy absorption capacity, with the square panel test exhibiting values approximately 2.5 times higher. Assessment of toughness levels, material cost, and CO 2 emissions is carried out from a sustainability perspective, with the optimal choice emphasized as the normal‐performance FRC matrix incorporating 9 kg of PP fiber.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70030
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polypropylene fiber assessment for achieving optimal toughness in sustainable tunnel lining selection with various concrete matrices

C.A. Ozturk, İsmȧil Özgür Yaman, Emin Şengün, Burhan Alam et al.
Structural Concrete
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Polypropylene fiber assessment for achieving optimal toughness in sustainable tunnel lining selection with various concrete matrices

C.A. Ozturk, İsmȧil Özgür Yaman, Emin Şengün, Burhan Alam, M. Hamahang Sherzai, Hali̇l Ceylan, Yalçın Oğuz Hetemoğlu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the performance of polypropylene (PP) fiber‐reinforced concrete mixes for tunnel‐lining applications, using four concrete types: pervious, moderate strength, high‐performance, and ultra‐high‐performance. The mixes incorporate fiber dosages up to 1.0% by volume, except for ultra‐high‐performance concrete, which includes up to 2.7%. Performance is assessed through flexural tests on 72 panels, following european standard (EN) 14488‐5 and American society for testing and materials (ASTM) 1550 standards. The findings show that fiber addition boosts energy absorption in pervious concrete, but volumes under 9 kg/m 3 (Vf‐1%) do not meet toughness criteria. A 24 kg/m 3 (Vf‐2.7%) fiber dosage also falls short, suggesting a need for a stronger matrix. Statistical analysis produced precise prediction equations ( R 2 >92%) for energy absorption, factoring in cementitious materials, water‐to‐cement ratio, fiber dosage, and aggregate ratio. These equations serve as valuable tools for predicting the performance of fiber‐reinforced concrete (FRC) mixtures based on concrete composition and fiber dosages. Notably, both square and round panel tests demonstrate a strong correlation ( R 2 = 94%) with respect to energy absorption capacity, with the square panel test exhibiting values approximately 2.5 times higher. Assessment of toughness levels, material cost, and CO 2 emissions is carried out from a sustainability perspective, with the optimal choice emphasized as the normal‐performance FRC matrix incorporating 9 kg of PP fiber.

Structural ConcreteVol. 26(5)
Western Michigan University (US), Iowa State University (US), Middle East Technical University (TR), Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.