China's Eco‐Civilisation, Climate Leviathan, and Hobbesian Energy Transition

Abstract Scholars have hitherto tended to theorise China's ecological civilisation project either as a form of environmental authoritarianism or as a vision of eco‐socialism. This paper contributes to the conversation by conducting a textual analysis of Chinese scholarly discussions on eco‐civilisation. The analysis uncovers topics and themes related to both narratives of environmental authoritarianism and eco‐socialist envisioning. It also captures the shift in discussion from an ideological critique of industrial civilisation to a techno‐bureaucratic agenda concerning sustainable development and governance strategies, along with the growing roles of the party‐state, state‐corporate cooperation, and geopolitical ambition. To interpret the findings, I revisit the neo‐Weberian institutionalist notion of embedded autonomy and revise it through critical realist Marxism, not only to explain the growing bureaucratisation of eco‐civilisation but also to untangle its Hobbesian institutional features that distinguish China's eco‐civilisation project (or the making of a Climate Leviathan) from the Western liberal mode of environmental governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70009
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China's Eco‐Civilisation, Climate Leviathan, and Hobbesian Energy Transition

David Chen
3 citations
Antipode
Climate Change and Geoengineering
3.32
article

China's Eco‐Civilisation, Climate Leviathan, and Hobbesian Energy Transition

David Chen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Scholars have hitherto tended to theorise China's ecological civilisation project either as a form of environmental authoritarianism or as a vision of eco‐socialism. This paper contributes to the conversation by conducting a textual analysis of Chinese scholarly discussions on eco‐civilisation. The analysis uncovers topics and themes related to both narratives of environmental authoritarianism and eco‐socialist envisioning. It also captures the shift in discussion from an ideological critique of industrial civilisation to a techno‐bureaucratic agenda concerning sustainable development and governance strategies, along with the growing roles of the party‐state, state‐corporate cooperation, and geopolitical ambition. To interpret the findings, I revisit the neo‐Weberian institutionalist notion of embedded autonomy and revise it through critical realist Marxism, not only to explain the growing bureaucratisation of eco‐civilisation but also to untangle its Hobbesian institutional features that distinguish China's eco‐civilisation project (or the making of a Climate Leviathan) from the Western liberal mode of environmental governance.

AntipodeVol. 57(3)
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China's Eco‐Civilisation, Climate Leviathan, and Hobbesian Energy Transition — David Chen · Antipode (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS