Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of the Lotic Fish Communities: A Comparison of Coffee Filter‐Based Passive e<scp>DNA</scp> Collection Versus Active e<scp>DNA</scp> Filtering

ABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a noninvasive and cost‐effective method for fish community monitoring, enabling the determination of both the presence/absence of fish species and their relative quantity in closed systems. However, the integration of these novel eDNA‐based methods into current monitoring practices is not straightforward and require standardization of methodological approaches. In this study, we investigated spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblages within two lotic systems in Croatia. Six sampling stations were located alongside the middle section of the river Sava upstream and downstream of Zagreb, and one location in the stream Okićnica. We compared traditional field surveys with two eDNA sampling methodologies: active eDNA filtering and passive eDNA collection. We showed that passive eDNA collection using coffee filters detected fish composition as effectively as active eDNA filtration, providing comparable results in terms of local species richness and spatial variation in fish assemblages. Generally, our eDNA approach detected a greater fish species richness per site than electrofishing. Each single sample captured an average of 18.3 species, from a total of 30 species encountered in the 78 samples. The sites upstream of Zagreb showed significant differences in species read abundance in comparison to the sites downstream. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot based on read abundance appeared to be structured according to the type of lotic system, with a clear separation in the two‐dimensional space between samples from the river Sava and stream Okićnica and between seasons. A substantial increase in read abundance during spawning periods of certain species was observed, emphasizing the method's utility in unraveling ecological complexities. Altogether, this study exemplifies how eDNA metabarcoding is a powerful tool for community monitoring, providing standardized information that will be valuable for environmental management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental DNA
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70065
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of the Lotic Fish Communities: A Comparison of Coffee Filter‐Based Passive eDNA Collection Versus Active eDNA Filtering

Ida Svetličić, Jelena Mlinarec, Matija Kresonja, Matea Rubinić et al.
4 citations
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
article

Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of the Lotic Fish Communities: A Comparison of Coffee Filter‐Based Passive eDNA Collection Versus Active eDNA Filtering

Ida Svetličić, Jelena Mlinarec, Matija Kresonja, Matea Rubinić, Tonko Megyery, Ivana Kaliger, Dominik Mihaljević
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a noninvasive and cost‐effective method for fish community monitoring, enabling the determination of both the presence/absence of fish species and their relative quantity in closed systems. However, the integration of these novel eDNA‐based methods into current monitoring practices is not straightforward and require standardization of methodological approaches. In this study, we investigated spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblages within two lotic systems in Croatia. Six sampling stations were located alongside the middle section of the river Sava upstream and downstream of Zagreb, and one location in the stream Okićnica. We compared traditional field surveys with two eDNA sampling methodologies: active eDNA filtering and passive eDNA collection. We showed that passive eDNA collection using coffee filters detected fish composition as effectively as active eDNA filtration, providing comparable results in terms of local species richness and spatial variation in fish assemblages. Generally, our eDNA approach detected a greater fish species richness per site than electrofishing. Each single sample captured an average of 18.3 species, from a total of 30 species encountered in the 78 samples. The sites upstream of Zagreb showed significant differences in species read abundance in comparison to the sites downstream. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot based on read abundance appeared to be structured according to the type of lotic system, with a clear separation in the two‐dimensional space between samples from the river Sava and stream Okićnica and between seasons. A substantial increase in read abundance during spawning periods of certain species was observed, emphasizing the method's utility in unraveling ecological complexities. Altogether, this study exemplifies how eDNA metabarcoding is a powerful tool for community monitoring, providing standardized information that will be valuable for environmental management.

Environmental DNAVol. 7(2)
Oikon (Croatia) (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.