Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements

ABSTRACT Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land‐intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental costs, prompting the development of several alternative bioenergy feedstocks. These feedstocks, selected in part for traits associated with ecosystem services, may provide opportunities for environmental benefits beyond fossil fuel displacement. We hypothesized that these bioenergy ecosystems will provide direct climatic cooling through their influence on carbon and radiative energy fluxes (i.e., through albedo). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential cooling effect of five current or potential bioenergy feedstocks using multi‐year records from eddy covariance towers. Perennial feedstocks were carbon sinks, with an annual mean net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of −2.7 ± 2.1 Mg C ha −1 for miscanthus, −0.8 ± 1.1 Mg C ha −1 for switchgrass, and −1.4 ± 0.7 Mg C ha −1 for prairie. In contrast, annual rotations were generally carbon sources, with an annual mean NECB of 2.6 ± 2.4 Mg C ha −1 for maize‐soy and 3.2 ± 2.1 Mg C ha −1 for sorghum‐soy. Using maize‐soy as a baseline, conversion to alternative feedstocks increased albedo, inducing further cooling. This effect was strongest for miscanthus, with −3.5 ± 2.0 W m −2 of radiative forcing, and weakest for sorghum, with −1.4 ± 1.4 W m −2 . When feedstock effects on carbon and albedo were compared using carbon equivalents, carbon fluxes were the stronger ecosystem effect, underscoring the role of perennial species as effective carbon sinks. This work highlights the impact of feedstock choice on ecosystem processes as an element of bioenergy land conversion strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70026
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements

Taylor Pederson, Caitlin E. Moore, Christy D. Gibson, Michael Benson et al.
5 citations
GCB Bioenergy
Bioenergy crop production and management
9.51
article

Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements

Taylor Pederson, Caitlin E. Moore, Christy D. Gibson, Michael Benson, Bethany Blakely, Carl J. Bernacchi, Evan Dracup
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land‐intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental costs, prompting the development of several alternative bioenergy feedstocks. These feedstocks, selected in part for traits associated with ecosystem services, may provide opportunities for environmental benefits beyond fossil fuel displacement. We hypothesized that these bioenergy ecosystems will provide direct climatic cooling through their influence on carbon and radiative energy fluxes (i.e., through albedo). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential cooling effect of five current or potential bioenergy feedstocks using multi‐year records from eddy covariance towers. Perennial feedstocks were carbon sinks, with an annual mean net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of −2.7 ± 2.1 Mg C ha −1 for miscanthus, −0.8 ± 1.1 Mg C ha −1 for switchgrass, and −1.4 ± 0.7 Mg C ha −1 for prairie. In contrast, annual rotations were generally carbon sources, with an annual mean NECB of 2.6 ± 2.4 Mg C ha −1 for maize‐soy and 3.2 ± 2.1 Mg C ha −1 for sorghum‐soy. Using maize‐soy as a baseline, conversion to alternative feedstocks increased albedo, inducing further cooling. This effect was strongest for miscanthus, with −3.5 ± 2.0 W m −2 of radiative forcing, and weakest for sorghum, with −1.4 ± 1.4 W m −2 . When feedstock effects on carbon and albedo were compared using carbon equivalents, carbon fluxes were the stronger ecosystem effect, underscoring the role of perennial species as effective carbon sinks. This work highlights the impact of feedstock choice on ecosystem processes as an element of bioenergy land conversion strategies.

GCB BioenergyVol. 17(4)
Agricultural Research Service (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), The University of Western Australia (AU)
U.S. Department of Energy, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Bioenergy crop production and management
9.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.