Closer Is Not Always More Credible: The Effect of Social Distance on Misinformation Processing

ABSTRACT Generally, people rely on source credibility to assess the truth of information and correct misinformation. This study aimed to investigate how social distance, a source characteristic, impacted the processing of misinformation. We conducted two studies to examine how social distance from the source of misinformation (Experiment 1) and corrective information (Experiment 2) influenced information processing. We found that misinformation was perceived as more truthful when provided by a close information source than by a distant information source. Moreover, the retraction of misinformation increased when the social distance of the retraction source decreased. Surprisingly, the social distance of the misinformation source provoked an unexpected reverse effect: misinformation from a close social distance source was easier to correct than that from a distant source.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70034
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closer Is Not Always More Credible: The Effect of Social Distance on Misinformation Processing

Guangzhen Jia, Siming Wang, Jimei Dong, Yang Liu et al.
2 citations
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
article

Closer Is Not Always More Credible: The Effect of Social Distance on Misinformation Processing

Guangzhen Jia, Siming Wang, Jimei Dong, Yang Liu, Yang Qingqing, Gongxiang Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Generally, people rely on source credibility to assess the truth of information and correct misinformation. This study aimed to investigate how social distance, a source characteristic, impacted the processing of misinformation. We conducted two studies to examine how social distance from the source of misinformation (Experiment 1) and corrective information (Experiment 2) influenced information processing. We found that misinformation was perceived as more truthful when provided by a close information source than by a distant information source. Moreover, the retraction of misinformation increased when the social distance of the retraction source decreased. Surprisingly, the social distance of the misinformation source provoked an unexpected reverse effect: misinformation from a close social distance source was easier to correct than that from a distant source.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 39(2)
University of Jinan (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.