Judge rules against university

CASE NAME: Lilly, et al. v. University of California‐San Diego, et al ., No. 21‐CV‐1703 (S.D. Cal. 09/30/24).

Publication Details

Journal
Recruiting & Retaining Adult Learners
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nsr.31301
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judge rules against university

Recruiting & Retaining Adult Learners
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

Judge rules against university

article en

Abstract

CASE NAME: Lilly, et al. v. University of California‐San Diego, et al ., No. 21‐CV‐1703 (S.D. Cal. 09/30/24).

Recruiting & Retaining Adult LearnersVol. 27(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Judge rules against university · Recruiting & Retaining Adult Learners (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS