The Self‐Magnification of British Leaders: Prime Ministers’ Perceptions and Projections of their Powers and Roles in the Postwar Era

Abstract Within the extensive literature on the powers and constraints of British prime ministers, there has been little comparison of the extent to which the premiers themselves have perceived or projected a personal entitlement to determine government policy. Using both quantitative and qualitative analysis, this article compares prime ministers who have asserted a right to be the ultimate decision maker with those who have embraced, and even emphasised, the determining role of government ministers and collective bodies in major policy making. For quantitative comparison, the focus is on prime ministers’ speeches to their party's annual conference, from Attlee in 1946 to Starmer in 2024. Margaret Thatcher's leadership emerges as a transition point. Post‐Thatcher, prime ministers have an augmented sense of their own prerogatives and a greater willingness to claim increasingly capacious powers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Political Quarterly
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13510
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Self‐Magnification of British Leaders: Prime Ministers’ Perceptions and Projections of their Powers and Roles in the Postwar Era

Archie Brown, Nicholas D. James
The Political Quarterly
Political and Economic history of UK and US
article

The Self‐Magnification of British Leaders: Prime Ministers’ Perceptions and Projections of their Powers and Roles in the Postwar Era

Archie Brown, Nicholas D. James
article en

Abstract

Abstract Within the extensive literature on the powers and constraints of British prime ministers, there has been little comparison of the extent to which the premiers themselves have perceived or projected a personal entitlement to determine government policy. Using both quantitative and qualitative analysis, this article compares prime ministers who have asserted a right to be the ultimate decision maker with those who have embraced, and even emphasised, the determining role of government ministers and collective bodies in major policy making. For quantitative comparison, the focus is on prime ministers’ speeches to their party's annual conference, from Attlee in 1946 to Starmer in 2024. Margaret Thatcher's leadership emerges as a transition point. Post‐Thatcher, prime ministers have an augmented sense of their own prerogatives and a greater willingness to claim increasingly capacious powers.

The Political QuarterlyVol. 96(2)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.