On methods for assessment of the value of observations in convection‐permitting data assimilation and numerical weather forecasting

Abstract In numerical weather prediction (NWP), a large number of observations are used to create initial conditions for weather forecasting through a process known as data assimilation. An assessment of the value of these observations for NWP can guide us in the design of future observation networks, help us to identify problems with the assimilation system, and allow us to assess changes to the assimilation system. However, assessment can be challenging in convection‐permitting NWP. This is because verification of convection‐permitting forecasts is not easy, the forecast model is strongly nonlinear, a limited‐area model is used, and the observations used often contain complex error statistics and are often associated with nonlinear observation operators. We compare methods that can be used to assess the value of observations in convection‐permitting NWP and discuss operational considerations when using these methods. We focus on their applicability to ensemble forecasting systems, as these systems are becoming increasingly dominant for convection‐permitting NWP. We also identify several future research directions, which include comparing results from different methods, comparing forecast validation using analyses versus using observations, applying flow‐dependent covariance localization, investigating the effect of ensemble size on the assessment, and generating and validating the nature run in observing‐system simulation experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4933
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On methods for assessment of the value of observations in convection‐permitting data assimilation and numerical weather forecasting

Ulrich Löhnert, David Simonin, Takemasa Miyoshi, Martin Weißmann et al.
3 citations
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
3.90
article

On methods for assessment of the value of observations in convection‐permitting data assimilation and numerical weather forecasting

Ulrich Löhnert, David Simonin, Takemasa Miyoshi, Martin Weißmann, Nikki C. Privé, Daisuke Hotta, Joanne A. Waller, S. B. Healy, Olaf Stiller, Sarah L. Dance, Guannan Hu, Alison Fowler, Xuguang Wang, Thomas Auligné
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In numerical weather prediction (NWP), a large number of observations are used to create initial conditions for weather forecasting through a process known as data assimilation. An assessment of the value of these observations for NWP can guide us in the design of future observation networks, help us to identify problems with the assimilation system, and allow us to assess changes to the assimilation system. However, assessment can be challenging in convection‐permitting NWP. This is because verification of convection‐permitting forecasts is not easy, the forecast model is strongly nonlinear, a limited‐area model is used, and the observations used often contain complex error statistics and are often associated with nonlinear observation operators. We compare methods that can be used to assess the value of observations in convection‐permitting NWP and discuss operational considerations when using these methods. We focus on their applicability to ensemble forecasting systems, as these systems are becoming increasingly dominant for convection‐permitting NWP. We also identify several future research directions, which include comparing results from different methods, comparing forecast validation using analyses versus using observations, applying flow‐dependent covariance localization, investigating the effect of ensemble size on the assessment, and generating and validating the nature run in observing‐system simulation experiments.

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyVol. 151(768)
Met Office (GB), University of Vienna (AT), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB), Deutscher Wetterdienst (DE), University of Cologne (DE), University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (US), Japan Meteorological Agency (JP), Pioneer (Japan) (JP), National Centre for Earth Observation (GB), RIKEN Center for Computational Science (JP), Meteorological Research Institute (JP), University of Reading (GB), Morgan State University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Met Office, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centre for Earth Observation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
3.90
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.