The DOE E3SM version 2.1: overview and assessment of the impacts of parameterized ocean submesoscales

Abstract. The U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) version 2.1 builds on E3SMv2 with several changes, with the most notable being the addition of the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization. This parameterization captures the effect of finite-amplitude, mixed-layer eddies as an overturning streamfunction and has the primary function of restratification. Herein, we outline the changes to the mean climate state of E3SM that were introduced by the addition of this parameterization. Overall, the presence of the submesoscale parameterization improves the fidelity of the v2.1 simulation by reducing the ocean surface biases in the North Atlantic present in v2, as illustrated by changes in the climatological sea surface temperature and salinity and the Arctic sea-ice extent. Other impacts include a slight shoaling of the mixed-layer depths in the North Atlantic and a small improvement in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). We note that the expected shoaling due to the parameterization is regionally dependent in our coupled configuration. In addition, we investigate why the parameterization and its impacts on mixed-layer depth have little impact on the simulated AMOC: despite increased dense-water formation in the Norwegian Sea, only a small fraction of the water formed makes its way south into the North Atlantic basin. Version 2.1 also exhibits small improvements in the atmospheric climatology, with smaller biases in many notable quantities and modes of variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The DOE E3SM version 2.1: overview and assessment of the impacts of parameterized ocean submesoscales

Nicole Jeffery, Mathew Maltrud, Chengzhu Zhang, LeAnn M. Conlon et al.
2 citations
Geoscientific model development
Climate variability and models
2.21
article

The DOE E3SM version 2.1: overview and assessment of the impacts of parameterized ocean submesoscales

Nicole Jeffery, Mathew Maltrud, Chengzhu Zhang, LeAnn M. Conlon, T. K. Tesfa, Yan Feng, Jean‐Christophe Golaz, Katherine Smith, Xue Zheng, Aixue Hu, Ana C. Ordoñez, Shaocheng Xie, Balwinder Singh, Alice Barthel, Karthik Balaguru, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Qi Tang, Luke Van Roekel, Walter M. Hannah, Bryce E. Harrop, Po‐Lun Ma, Gautam Bisht, Oluwayemi A. Garuba, Mark Petersen, Carolyn Begeman, James J. Benedict, Jiwoo Lee, Peter J. Gleckler, Ben Moore-Maley, Anthony Bartoletti, Wuyin Lin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. The U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) version 2.1 builds on E3SMv2 with several changes, with the most notable being the addition of the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization. This parameterization captures the effect of finite-amplitude, mixed-layer eddies as an overturning streamfunction and has the primary function of restratification. Herein, we outline the changes to the mean climate state of E3SM that were introduced by the addition of this parameterization. Overall, the presence of the submesoscale parameterization improves the fidelity of the v2.1 simulation by reducing the ocean surface biases in the North Atlantic present in v2, as illustrated by changes in the climatological sea surface temperature and salinity and the Arctic sea-ice extent. Other impacts include a slight shoaling of the mixed-layer depths in the North Atlantic and a small improvement in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). We note that the expected shoaling due to the parameterization is regionally dependent in our coupled configuration. In addition, we investigate why the parameterization and its impacts on mixed-layer depth have little impact on the simulated AMOC: despite increased dense-water formation in the Norwegian Sea, only a small fraction of the water formed makes its way south into the North Atlantic basin. Version 2.1 also exhibits small improvements in the atmospheric climatology, with smaller biases in many notable quantities and modes of variability.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(5)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Argonne National Laboratory (US), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Climate variability and models
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.