Knowledge Commercialization and University Audit Fees: A UK‐Based Study

ABSTRACT In the face of stiffening sector competition and reduced government funding, universities in many countries increasingly seek to diversify their revenue. One prominent way employed by universities to achieve revenue diversification is the commercialization of research knowledge. However, knowledge commercialization could be regarded as a risky enterprise for many institutions, especially those lacking the capacity to support commercial activity. To investigate these issues, we examine the impact of knowledge commercialization on the audit fees charged to UK universities. Using a panel dataset covering 2010/11–2019/20, we find that knowledge commercialization is positively associated with university audit fees, indicating that auditors may charge more to compensate for the greater workloads and risks associated with auditing universities with more commercial activity. Further analysis shows that the positive commercialization–fees relationship is weaker in universities that spend more on research and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects, suggesting that auditors perceive knowledge commercialization activities as carrying lower risk if the university has more capacity for undertaking research that can be commercialized. We conclude by discussing the implications of what we identify as a growing divergence among universities in their ability to commercialize research knowledge as perceived by auditors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Accountability and Management
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12434
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge Commercialization and University Audit Fees: A UK‐Based Study

Rhys Andrews, Dennis De Widt, Shuo Sun
1 citations
Financial Accountability and Management
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
2.23
article

Knowledge Commercialization and University Audit Fees: A UK‐Based Study

Rhys Andrews, Dennis De Widt, Shuo Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the face of stiffening sector competition and reduced government funding, universities in many countries increasingly seek to diversify their revenue. One prominent way employed by universities to achieve revenue diversification is the commercialization of research knowledge. However, knowledge commercialization could be regarded as a risky enterprise for many institutions, especially those lacking the capacity to support commercial activity. To investigate these issues, we examine the impact of knowledge commercialization on the audit fees charged to UK universities. Using a panel dataset covering 2010/11–2019/20, we find that knowledge commercialization is positively associated with university audit fees, indicating that auditors may charge more to compensate for the greater workloads and risks associated with auditing universities with more commercial activity. Further analysis shows that the positive commercialization–fees relationship is weaker in universities that spend more on research and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects, suggesting that auditors perceive knowledge commercialization activities as carrying lower risk if the university has more capacity for undertaking research that can be commercialized. We conclude by discussing the implications of what we identify as a growing divergence among universities in their ability to commercialize research knowledge as perceived by auditors.

Financial Accountability and ManagementVol. 41(4)
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.