How Not to Deliver Policies: Lessons in Undeliverability from the Conservative Governments of 2019–2024

Abstract This article focusses on why, when and where government policies may become undeliverable. It therefore adds a distinctive dimension to the traditional analysis of policy failure, while also contributing to more solution‐orientated analyses of effective policy making. Its central argument is that ‘some policies are born undeliverable, some attain undeliverability and some have undeliverability thrust upon them’ and this is demonstrated through examination of five policy areas (‘levelling‐up’, ‘a transport revolution’, ‘build and fund 40 new hospitals’, ‘take back control of borders’ and ‘fix our immigration system’). Using recent National Audit Office reports and parliamentary inquiries, this article offers an evidence‐based focus on the twin dimensions of promises and processes as the key explanatory variables in understanding policy undeliverability. For British politics, this argument regarding undeliverability has major implications as Keir Starmer seeks to pilot a new approach to mission‐orientated policy making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Political Quarterly
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13513
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Not to Deliver Policies: Lessons in Undeliverability from the Conservative Governments of 2019–2024

Matthew Flinders, John Connolly, David Judge
1 citations
The Political Quarterly
Political and Economic history of UK and US
8.52
article

How Not to Deliver Policies: Lessons in Undeliverability from the Conservative Governments of 2019–2024

Matthew Flinders, John Connolly, David Judge
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article focusses on why, when and where government policies may become undeliverable. It therefore adds a distinctive dimension to the traditional analysis of policy failure, while also contributing to more solution‐orientated analyses of effective policy making. Its central argument is that ‘some policies are born undeliverable, some attain undeliverability and some have undeliverability thrust upon them’ and this is demonstrated through examination of five policy areas (‘levelling‐up’, ‘a transport revolution’, ‘build and fund 40 new hospitals’, ‘take back control of borders’ and ‘fix our immigration system’). Using recent National Audit Office reports and parliamentary inquiries, this article offers an evidence‐based focus on the twin dimensions of promises and processes as the key explanatory variables in understanding policy undeliverability. For British politics, this argument regarding undeliverability has major implications as Keir Starmer seeks to pilot a new approach to mission‐orientated policy making.

The Political QuarterlyVol. 96(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.