Auditor Extra‐Billing and Client‐Initiated Auditor Changes

ABSTRACT This paper examines how auditor extra‐billing and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship affect client‐initiated auditor changes. Extra‐billing is an auditor billing practice where the auditor invoices a higher amount than originally negotiated with the client. Although extra‐billing is common in audit practice, it has not yet received much attention in audit research. Understanding audit as a professional service, we conceptualize extra‐billing as a factor that is instrumental in creating or preventing bonding, which influences the repeat purchasing behaviour of a client, such as retaining an incumbent auditor. Seventy‐eight board members responsible for audit matters completed a case that varied auditor extra‐billing (no extra‐billing or extra‐billing) and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship (good or bad relationship). The results show that both an extra‐billing and a bad auditor–board member relationship increase the likelihood of a client‐initiated auditor change. These results have important implications for auditors, auditees and audit regulators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Auditing
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12373
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditor Extra‐Billing and Client‐Initiated Auditor Changes

Martín Schmidt, Francis Goddard
International Journal of Auditing
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Auditor Extra‐Billing and Client‐Initiated Auditor Changes

Martín Schmidt, Francis Goddard
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines how auditor extra‐billing and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship affect client‐initiated auditor changes. Extra‐billing is an auditor billing practice where the auditor invoices a higher amount than originally negotiated with the client. Although extra‐billing is common in audit practice, it has not yet received much attention in audit research. Understanding audit as a professional service, we conceptualize extra‐billing as a factor that is instrumental in creating or preventing bonding, which influences the repeat purchasing behaviour of a client, such as retaining an incumbent auditor. Seventy‐eight board members responsible for audit matters completed a case that varied auditor extra‐billing (no extra‐billing or extra‐billing) and the quality of the auditor–board member relationship (good or bad relationship). The results show that both an extra‐billing and a bad auditor–board member relationship increase the likelihood of a client‐initiated auditor change. These results have important implications for auditors, auditees and audit regulators.

International Journal of AuditingVol. 29(3)
ESCP Business School (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.