Stories From the Trenches: The Difference Disability Makes in the Campaign Experiences of Candidates With Disabilities

ABSTRACT Objective Persons with disabilities are a large and significant segment of the American public, yet Americans with disabilities are only beginning to be considered as political candidates or officeholders. Methods This paper reports on in‐depth interviews with 21 individuals with physical disabilities who have stood for office in recent election cycles. The interviews focused on candidates’ reasons for running, their campaign experiences, and how their disabilities affected their campaigns. Results Findings show multiple reasons for their candidacies while demonstrating similar obstacles as those faced by other “marginalized” groups. Respondents also reported surprisingly positive aspects of campaigning with a disability. Conclusion The work has implications for some tried‐and‐true political science concepts characterizing the situation of other under‐represented groups: descriptive and substantive representation, the importance of developing an eligible pool of potential candidates, and contextual factors showing the importance of variation as well as commonalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stories From the Trenches: The Difference Disability Makes in the Campaign Experiences of Candidates With Disabilities

Richard K. Scotch, Sally Friedman
2 citations
Social Science Quarterly
Gender Politics and Representation
7.73
article

Stories From the Trenches: The Difference Disability Makes in the Campaign Experiences of Candidates With Disabilities

Richard K. Scotch, Sally Friedman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Persons with disabilities are a large and significant segment of the American public, yet Americans with disabilities are only beginning to be considered as political candidates or officeholders. Methods This paper reports on in‐depth interviews with 21 individuals with physical disabilities who have stood for office in recent election cycles. The interviews focused on candidates’ reasons for running, their campaign experiences, and how their disabilities affected their campaigns. Results Findings show multiple reasons for their candidacies while demonstrating similar obstacles as those faced by other “marginalized” groups. Respondents also reported surprisingly positive aspects of campaigning with a disability. Conclusion The work has implications for some tried‐and‐true political science concepts characterizing the situation of other under‐represented groups: descriptive and substantive representation, the importance of developing an eligible pool of potential candidates, and contextual factors showing the importance of variation as well as commonalities.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 106(2)
The University of Texas at Dallas (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Politics and Representation
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.