Characterization of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes of different pretreatment combined with irradiation based on flavor profiles usingE-nose, E-tongue and HS-SPME-GC–MS

The effects of different pretreatment combined with irradiation on the flavor profiles of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes were explored by using electronic nose, electronic tongue and headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). The results showed that electronic nose analysis indicated distinct odor profiles before and after irradiation, with PCA effectively differentiating them. The low-temperature pretreatment group had the smallest difference from the control (CK). After 180 days of storage, odor profiles of all samples converged, with low-temperature, 0.1 % rosemary, and 0.1 % TBHQ groups showing minimal differences from CK. Electronic tongue profiles showed no significant differences among treatments, with PCA unable to effectively distinguish most groups, except for the 0.1 % rosemary and 0.1 % sesamol groups. The results of HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis showed that the volatile compounds of the samples of each treatment were significantly different. The 6 kGy (kilogray) irradiation group, the low temperature pretreatment and the control group (CK) clustered into one category. After 180 d of storage at room temperature, only the low temperature pretreatment group and the control group (CK) were clustered into one category. The results of relative odor activity value (ROAV) showed that the key flavor compounds of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes were heptanal, octanal, (<i>E</i>)-2-octenal, nonanal, (<i>E,E</i>)-2,4-nonadienal, decanal, (<i>E</i>)-2-decenal, (<i>E,E</i>)-2,4-decadienal, 2-undecanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and 2-pentylfuran. Aldehydes contents in the samples increased after irradiation, which was the main components leading to the off-odor of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes after irradiation, and the key flavor compounds of the samples decreased after 180 d of storage at room temperature. In conclusion, low temperature or pretreatment of three antioxidants could maintain the flavor of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes after irradiation, and low temperature had the best effect. This study could provide theoretical reference for the application of irradiation technology in the sterilization and preservation processing of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes and its flavor control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Chemistry X
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102352
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes of different pretreatment combined with irradiation based on flavor profiles usingE-nose, E-tongue and HS-SPME-GC–MS

Meijuan Yu, Yiji Zhou, Ling Peng, Qing Yang et al.
2 citations
Food Chemistry X
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
2.32
article

Characterization of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes of different pretreatment combined with irradiation based on flavor profiles usingE-nose, E-tongue and HS-SPME-GC–MS

Meijuan Yu, Yiji Zhou, Ling Peng, Qing Yang, Qiling Zhang, Guimin Huang, Feng Guo, Jianhui Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Lu Liu, Chao Deng, Yong‐Wei Zhang, Qing Mao, Wenge Li, Yuanfang Xu, Mengyun Ouyang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The effects of different pretreatment combined with irradiation on the flavor profiles of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes were explored by using electronic nose, electronic tongue and headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). The results showed that electronic nose analysis indicated distinct odor profiles before and after irradiation, with PCA effectively differentiating them. The low-temperature pretreatment group had the smallest difference from the control (CK). After 180 days of storage, odor profiles of all samples converged, with low-temperature, 0.1 % rosemary, and 0.1 % TBHQ groups showing minimal differences from CK. Electronic tongue profiles showed no significant differences among treatments, with PCA unable to effectively distinguish most groups, except for the 0.1 % rosemary and 0.1 % sesamol groups. The results of HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis showed that the volatile compounds of the samples of each treatment were significantly different. The 6 kGy (kilogray) irradiation group, the low temperature pretreatment and the control group (CK) clustered into one category. After 180 d of storage at room temperature, only the low temperature pretreatment group and the control group (CK) were clustered into one category. The results of relative odor activity value (ROAV) showed that the key flavor compounds of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes were heptanal, octanal, (<i>E</i>)-2-octenal, nonanal, (<i>E,E</i>)-2,4-nonadienal, decanal, (<i>E</i>)-2-decenal, (<i>E,E</i>)-2,4-decadienal, 2-undecanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and 2-pentylfuran. Aldehydes contents in the samples increased after irradiation, which was the main components leading to the off-odor of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes after irradiation, and the key flavor compounds of the samples decreased after 180 d of storage at room temperature. In conclusion, low temperature or pretreatment of three antioxidants could maintain the flavor of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes after irradiation, and low temperature had the best effect. This study could provide theoretical reference for the application of irradiation technology in the sterilization and preservation processing of prepared soft-shelled turtle dishes and its flavor control.

Food Chemistry XVol. 27
Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Hunan Agricultural Products (China) (CN), Hunan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Guangdong Province Environmental Monitoring Center (CN), Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.