Analyzing the generalization capabilities of a hybrid hydrological model for extrapolation to extreme events

Abstract. Data-driven techniques have shown the potential to outperform process-based models in rainfall–runoff simulation. Recently, hybrid models, which combine data-driven methods with process-based approaches, have been proposed to leverage the strengths of both methodologies, aiming to enhance simulation accuracy while maintaining a certain interpretability. Expanding the set of test cases to evaluate hybrid models under different conditions, we test their generalization capabilities for extreme hydrological events, comparing their performance against long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and process-based models. Our results indicate that hybrid models show performance similar to that of the LSTM network for most cases. However, hybrid models reported slightly lower errors in the most extreme cases and were able to produce higher peak discharges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1277-2025
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the generalization capabilities of a hybrid hydrological model for extrapolation to extreme events

Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Frederik Kratzert, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Ralf Loritz et al.
12 citations
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
9.80
article

Analyzing the generalization capabilities of a hybrid hydrological model for extrapolation to extreme events

Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Frederik Kratzert, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Ralf Loritz, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Uwe Ehret
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Data-driven techniques have shown the potential to outperform process-based models in rainfall–runoff simulation. Recently, hybrid models, which combine data-driven methods with process-based approaches, have been proposed to leverage the strengths of both methodologies, aiming to enhance simulation accuracy while maintaining a certain interpretability. Expanding the set of test cases to evaluate hybrid models under different conditions, we test their generalization capabilities for extreme hydrological events, comparing their performance against long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and process-based models. Our results indicate that hybrid models show performance similar to that of the LSTM network for most cases. However, hybrid models reported slightly lower errors in the most extreme cases and were able to produce higher peak discharges.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 29(5)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Google (Switzerland) (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
9.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing the generalization capabilities of a hybrid hydrological model for extrapolation to extreme events — Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Frederik Kratzert, et al. · Hydrology and earth system sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS